ArticleJIMD reports2018
Introduction of a Simple Second Tier Screening Test for C5 Isobars in Dried Blood Spots: Reducing the False Positive Rate for Isovaleric Acidaemia in Expanded Newborn Screening.
Article in JIMD reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Practical Considerations for the Diagnosis and Management of Isovaleryl-CoA-Dehydrogenase Deficiency (Isovaleric Acidemia): Systematic Search and Review and Expert Opinions.International journal of neonatal screening · 2025Review
- Newborn Screening for Isovaleric Acidemia: Treatment With Pivalate-Generating Antibiotics Contributed to False C5-Carnitine Positivity in a Chinese Population.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2024Article
- Retrospective Review of Positive Newborn Screening Results for Isovaleric Acidemia and Development of a Strategy to Improve the Efficacy of Newborn Screening in the UK.International journal of neonatal screening · 2024Article
- Validation of a targeted metabolomics panel for improved second-tier newborn screening.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2023Article
- Neonatal screening for isovaleric aciduria: Reducing the increasingly high false-positive rate in Germany.JIMD reports · 2023Article
- A Simple Flow Injection Analysis-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method to Reduce False Positives of C5-Acylcarnitines Due to Pivaloylcarnitine Using Reference Ions.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- [Impact of the inclusion of second-tier tests in the newborn screening program of Catalonia and in other international programs.]Revista espanola de salud publica · 2020Article
- Essential oils can cause false-positive results of medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency.Molecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2020Article
- Development of Strategies to Decrease False Positive Results in Newborn Screening.International journal of neonatal screening · 2020Review
- [False positive on neonatal screening: C5-carnitin increase in newborns due to pre-labour treatment with cefditoren pivoxil].Revista espanola de salud publica · 2018Article
- Raising Awareness of False Positive Newborn Screening Results Arising from Pivalate-Containing Creams and Antibiotics in Europe When Screening for Isovaleric Acidaemia.International journal of neonatal screening · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2015 the English Newborn Screening programme expanded to include Isovaleric Acidaemia (IVA). Screening is performed by flow injection analysis tandem mass spectrometry of isovalerylcarnitine. Isovalerylcarnitine is isobaric with pivaloylcarnitine which can be present in blood due to the use of pivalic ester pro-drugs or pivalic acid derivatives used as emollients in some nipple creams; the potential for false positives (FP) is well documented. A pilot study in England screened 438,164 babies, 18 had presumptive positive results but only 4 were confirmed as true positives (TP). We developed a simple test to separate the isobaric compounds and investigate these samples further.We studied newborn screening blood spots from 122 randomised controls and 34 infants with an initial raised C5 result. Dried blood spots were eluted with 30% acetonitrile (150 μL) and injected into a Waters Acquity UPLC coupled to a Waters Premier XE tandem mass spectrometer operating in positive ion mode. Isocratic separation of isovalerylcarnitine, pivaloylcarnitine, valerylcarnitine and 2-methylbutyrylcarnitine was achieved within 8 min. Assay performance characteristics were acceptable and non-parametric reference ranges (n = 122) were determined for each analyte.If this method had been used as a second tier test for the 34 presumptive positive samples, the number of FP's would have reduced from 24 to 8 and the positive predictive value of the screening test would have increased from 29 to 56%. Introduction of this test into the screening protocol has the potential to significantly reduce FP results for IVA and prevent unnecessary anxiety.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.