Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28631146›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2017

Motivations for Interest, Disinterest and Uncertainty in Intrauterine Device Use Among Young Women.

Anu Manchikanti Gomez, Bridget Freihart

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Epidemiological Survey on the Perception of Adverse Effects in Women Using Contraceptive Methods in Brazil.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anu Manchikanti GomezSexual Health and Reproductive Equity (SHARE) Program, School of Social Welfare, University of California, 120 Haviland Hall MC 7400, Berkeley, CA, 94720-7400, USA. anugomez@berkeley.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9461-4411
Bridget FreihartSexual Health and Reproductive Equity (SHARE) Program, School of Social Welfare, University of California, 120 Haviland Hall MC 7400, Berkeley, CA, 94720-7400, USA.
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Center for Research and Education on Gender and Sexuality N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective To elucidate salient contraceptive preferences and priorities as they relate to young women's interest or lack thereof in intrauterine device (IUD) use. Methods Qualitative data were drawn from a 2012 survey on contraceptive preferences and IUD interest. Among 413 young (ages 18-29) women, open-ended responses describing reasons for interest, disinterest or uncertainty in future IUD use were examined using a thematic analysis approach. Results Most participants were unsure about (49.2%) or not interested in (30.0%) future IUD use. Themes regarding IUD interest related to specific facets of IUD use (e.g., risks and side effects, ease of use), as well as broader influences on contraceptive decision-making (e.g., social influences, alignment with pregnancy intentions). For interested participants, a sense of empowerment pervaded the responses, with many references to the ease of use and lack of requisite maintenance. Uninterested participants were concerned about the internal nature of the IUD, with many describing "horror stories" and fears that the IUD would cause injury or infertility. Unsure participants provided more detailed and complex responses, carefully weighing the advantages and disadvantages of IUD use. Uncertainty was often driven by an acknowledged need for specific information, rather than overall lack of knowledge. Conclusions for Practice In this analysis, many women had a clear sense of their contraceptive preferences, which frequently did not align with IUDs. While continuing to remove barriers to IUD access is critical, patient-centered counseling approaches offer the opportunity to support women in best matching with a method that aligns with their preferences.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorDecision MakingMotivationUncertaintyAdolescentAdultCaliforniaContraceptionFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansIntrauterine DevicesPregnancyQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultContraceptive decision-makingIntrauterine device (IUD)Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC)Young women

Identifiers

PMID28631146
OpenAlexW2684927762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.