ReviewDer Pathologe2017
[Expression of cancer testis (CT) antigens in pediatric and adolescent melanomas].
Review in Der Pathologe, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOne of the main problems in the diagnostics of pediatric melanomas is the differentiation from benign dermal lesions typical for this age group, such as Spitz nevus. The biological behavior of pediatric melanomas differs considerably from that of melanomas in adults. MATERIAL AND
methodsCancer testis (CT) antigens are named after their typical expression pattern since they are present in various types of malignant tumors but in normal adult tissues are solely expressed in testicular germ cells. Because of this tumor-associated expression pattern, CT antigens are regarded as potential targets for vaccine-based immunotherapy of cancer and might be used as diagnostic tools in surgical pathology. In adults, melanoma is among the tumors showing a high incidence of CT antigen expression; however, while there is ample knowledge about adult melanomas, little is known about the presence of CT antigens in pediatric melanomas. Consequently, the expression of CT antigens MAGE-A1, MAGE-A4, CT7/MAGE-C1, NY-ESO-1, and GAGE was analyzed in a series of pediatric melanomas. The study was restricted to cases of metastatic disease and/or fatal outcome. A total of 12 cases were available and immunohistochemically analyzed with monoclonal antibodies (mAb).
resultsThe expression of CT antigens was generally low and present in only 4 of 12 cases. This is in stark contrast to the expression of these antigens in adult melanomas. Moreover, the extent of expression was very limited with most cases showing only a focal CT antigen expression and only marked in very small tumor areas (<5%).
conclusionDespite the low case numbers this study indicates that CT antigens are most likely not useful as diagnostic markers in pediatric melanomas or as targets for vaccine-based immunotherapy. It supports the notion that pediatric melanomas show a different biological behavior than their adult counterparts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.