Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28631099›Full record

SynthesisPsychopharmacology2017

Discontinuation of pharmacological treatment of children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: meta-analysis of 63 studies enrolling 11,788 patients.

M Riera, X Castells, A Tobias, R Cunill, L Blanco, D Capellà

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychopharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Amphetamines for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A systematic meta-review of systematic reviews on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

M RieraEthics Committee of University Hospital of Girona Dr. Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain.
X CastellsPharmacology Unit, TransLab Research Group, Department of Medical Sciences, Universitat de Girona, C/ Emili Grahit, 77, 17003, Girona, Spain. xavier.castells@udg.edu.
A TobiasClinical Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA), Spanish Council for Scientific Research (CSIC), Barcelona, Spain.
R CunillParc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu-Numància, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.
L BlancoPharmacology Unit, TransLab Research Group, Department of Medical Sciences, Universitat de Girona, C/ Emili Grahit, 77, 17003, Girona, Spain.
D CapellàPharmacology Unit, TransLab Research Group, Department of Medical Sciences, Universitat de Girona, C/ Emili Grahit, 77, 17003, Girona, Spain.
University of Girona · ESInstitut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona · ESInstitute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research · ESParc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu · ES

Funding

Universitat de Girona IFUdG2015/17, MPCUdG2016/ref50
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe risk-benefit balance of pharmacological treatment for children and adolescents with ADHD and the factors that moderate this relationship are unclear.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trials (RPCCTs) investigating the efficacy of pharmacological treatment in children or adolescents with ADHD was carried out. Meta-analysis of treatment discontinuation, clinician-, parent- and teacher-rated efficacy and adverse events was performed. The effect of covariates was studied.

resultsSixty-three studies were included. Ten drugs were investigated, with atomoxetine and methylphenidate the most frequently studied. RPCCTs had mostly a short duration (7.9 weeks). All-cause treatment discontinuation was lower with pharmacological treatment than placebo (OR = 0.68). Pharmacological treatment was more efficacious than placebo independently of the rater (clinician, standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.74; parent, SMD = 0.63; or teacher, SMD = 0.75). Evidence of publication bias was found for clinician-rated efficacy, especially in industry-sponsored RPCCT. Psychostimulants showed a higher efficacy and were associated with a better outcome on treatment discontinuation than non-stimulant drugs. Efficacy was smaller in RPCCTs for which a psychiatric comorbid disorder was an inclusion criterion, was larger in studies with a commercial sponsorship and showed a negative association with treatment length.

conclusionsIn the short term, pharmacological treatment provides moderate-high symptom relief, is safe and shows lower treatment discontinuation than placebo, suggesting a suitable risk-benefit balance, particularly with psychostimulants. The efficacy is lower in patients with a comorbid psychiatric disorder and should be assessed periodically, as it appears to reduce over time. Publication bias of clinician-rated efficacy in studies with a commercial sponsor is suggested.

Indexed as

AdolescentAtomoxetine HydrochlorideAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityCentral Nervous System StimulantsChildFemaleHumansMaleMethylphenidateTreatment OutcomeWithholding TreatmentAtomoxetine HydrochlorideCentral Nervous System StimulantsMethylphenidateAttention deficit hyperactivity disorderControlled clinical trialDiscontinuationEfficacyMeta-analysisMeta-regressionSafety

Identifiers

PMID28631099
OpenAlexW2694313996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.