Response to Hohenlohe

Bridgett M vonHoldt, James A Cahill, Ilan Gronau, Beth Shapiro, Jeff Wall, Robert K Wayne

Abstract readComment

In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

6citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

Modeling Williams syndrome from a neurodevelopmental perspective: recent advances, model-based translational insights and future directions.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2026
Review
Geographic patterns in morphometric and genetic variation for coyote populations with emphasis on southeastern coyotes.Ecology and evolution · 2019
Article
Population genomics of grey wolves and wolf-like canids in North America.PLoS genetics · 2018
Article
Is the Red Wolf a Listable Unit Under the US Endangered Species Act?The Journal of heredity · 2018
Article
Size-assortative choice and mate availability influences hybridization between red wolves (Ecology and evolution · 2018
Article
Studies of wolf x coyote hybridization via artificial insemination.PloS one · 2017
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

Comment on
Comment on "Whole-genome sequence analysis shows two endemic species of North American wolf are admixtures of the coyote and gray wolf".2017

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bridgett M vonHoldtDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.

James A CahillDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.

Ilan GronauEfi Arazi School of Computer Science, Herzliya Interdisciplinary Center, Herzliya 46510, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-8536-4062

Beth ShapiroDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.

Jeff WallDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5066-1235

Robert K WayneDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90094, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A response to Hohenlohe

Indexed as

CoyotesWolvesAnimalsSequence AnalysisUnited States

Identifiers

PMID28630935

DOI10.1126/sciadv.1701233

PMCPMC5462503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.