Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28630882›Full record

ReviewNeurophotonics2017

Review: How do spontaneous and sensory-evoked activities interact?

Isabelle Ferezou, Thomas Deneux

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurophotonics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Noninvasive Biomarkers for Assessing the Excitatory/Inhibitory Imbalance in Children with Epilepsy.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Music of Silence: Part II: Music Listening Induces Imagery Responses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Hallucination, imagery, dreaming: reassembling stimulus-independent perceptions based on Edmund Parish's classic misperception framework.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Effects of Locomotion on Visual Responses in the Mouse Superior Colliculus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Isabelle FerezouUnité de Neurosciences, Information et Complexité, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Thomas DeneuxUnité de Neurosciences, Information et Complexité, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay · FRUnit of Neuroscience Information and Complexity · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Twenty years ago, the seminal work of Grinvald et al. revolutionized the view cast on spontaneous cortical activity by showing how, instead of being a mere measure of noise, it profoundly impacts cortical responses to a sensory input and therefore could play a role in sensory processing. This paved the way for a number of studies on the interactions between spontaneous and sensory-evoked activities. Spontaneous activity has subsequently been found to be highly structured and to participate in high cognitive functions, such as influencing conscious perception in humans. However, its functional role remains poorly understood, and only a few speculations exist, from the maintenance of the cortical network to the internal representation of an

Indexed as

brain statescerebral cortexsensory processingspontaneous activity

Identifiers

PMID28630882
PMCPMC5469390
OpenAlexW2625923603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.