Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28630881›Full record

ReviewNeurophotonics2017

Review of functional and clinical relevance of intrinsic signal optical imaging in human brain mapping.

Katherine A Morone, Joseph S Neimat, Anna W Roe, Robert M Friedman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurophotonics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. ACS chemical neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  4. Biomedical optics express · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Label-free Optical Imaging of Membrane Potential.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2019
    Article
  18. Imaging the aged brain: pertinence and methods.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katherine A MoroneVanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Joseph S NeimatUniversity of Louisville School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Louisville, Kentucky, United States.
Anna W RoeOregon Health and Science University, Division of Neuroscience, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, Oregon, United States.
Robert M FriedmanOregon Health and Science University, Division of Neuroscience, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, Oregon, United States.

Funding

Optical Imaging of Tactile Information in SI CortexR01NS044375 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI FRIEDMAN, ROBERT MARK, ROE, ANNA W. · 2003 to 2012
$3.6M
Neural basis of tactile object perception in SI cortexR01NS093998 · NINDS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI FRIEDMAN, ROBERT MARK · 2016 to 2020
$2.9M
The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)TL1TR000447 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$1.2M
An ERP Study of Infant Numerosity in Fetal Alcohol SyndromeR21AA020515 · NIAAA · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BERGER, ANDREA, JACOBSON, SANDRA W. · 2011 to 2012
$413k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000447NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA020515NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS044375NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS093998
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrinsic signal optical imaging (ISOI) within the first decade of its use in humans showed its capacity as a precise functional mapping tool. It is a powerful tool that can be used intraoperatively to help a surgeon to directly identify functional areas of the cerebral cortex. Its use is limited to the intraoperative setting as it requires a craniotomy and durotomy for direct visualization of the brain. It has been applied in humans to study language, somatosensory and visual cortices, cortical hemodynamics, epileptiform activity, and lesion delineation. Despite studies showing clear evidence of its usefulness in clinical care, its clinical use in humans has not grown. Impediments imposed by imaging in a human operating room setting have hindered such work. However, recent studies have been aimed at overcoming obstacles in clinical studies establishing the benefits of its use to patients. This review provides a description of ISOI and its use in human studies with an emphasis on the challenges that have hindered its widespread use and the recent studies that aim to overcome these hurdles. Clinical studies establishing the benefits of its use to patients would serve as the impetus for continued development and use in humans.

Indexed as

functional mappinghumanintrinsic signal optical imagingoperating room

Identifiers

PMID28630881
PMCPMC5466092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.