Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28630818›Full record

ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2017

Ethical Considerations for Interdisciplinary Collaboration with Prescribing Professionals.

Mindy K Newhouse-Oisten, Kimberly M Peck, Alissa A Conway, Jessica E Frieder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Educational Leadership for Sustainable Capacity Building Towards Enhancing Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Computer-Aided Drug Design and Network Pharmacology: A Systematic Review.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mindy K Newhouse-OistenDepartment of Psychology, Western Michigan University, Mail Stop 5439, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 USA.
Kimberly M PeckDepartment of Psychology, Western Michigan University, Mail Stop 5439, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 USA.
Alissa A ConwayDepartment of Psychology, Western Michigan University, Mail Stop 5439, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 USA.
Jessica E FriederDepartment of Psychology, Western Michigan University, Mail Stop 5439, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavior analysts often work as part of an interdisciplinary team, and different team members may prescribe different interventions for a single client. One such intervention that is commonly encountered is a change in medication. Changes in medication regimens have the potential to alter behavior in a number of ways. As such, it is important for all team members to be aware of every intervention and to consider how different interventions may interact with each other. These facts make regular and clear communication among team members vital for treatment success. While working as part of an interdisciplinary team, behavior analysts must abide by their ethics code, which sometimes means advocating for their client with the rest of the team. This article will review some possible implications of medicinal interventions, potential ethical issues that can arise, and a case study from the authors' experience. Finally, the authors propose a decision-making tree that can aid in determining the best course of action when a team member proposes an intervention in addition to, or concurrent with, interventions proposed by the behavior analyst.

Indexed as

Behavioral interventionsEthical considerationsInterdisciplinary treatmentMedications

Identifiers

PMID28630818
PMCPMC5459773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.