Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28630804›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2017

Diversity analysis of gut microbiota in osteoporosis and osteopenia patients.

Jihan Wang, Yangyang Wang, Wenjie Gao, Biao Wang, Heping Zhao, Yuhong Zeng, Yanhong Ji, Dingjun Hao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 150 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
150citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

150 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 230 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Gut microbiome and bone health: update on mechanisms, clinical correlations, and possible treatment strategies.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Links between bone fractures and the gut microbiota.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Oral Administration ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Gut microbiome in early life and bone health outcomes at age 6: a Danish mother-child cohort study.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

90 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jihan Wang *Hong Hui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Yangyang Wang *The Tenth Research Institute of Telecommunications Technology, Xi'an, China.
Wenjie Gao *Hong Hui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Biao WangHong Hui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Heping ZhaoHong Hui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Yuhong ZengHong Hui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Yanhong JiDepartment of Pathogenic Biology and Immunology, Key Laboratory of Environment and Genes Related to Diseases, Ministry of Education of China, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, China.
Dingjun HaoHong Hui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNXi'an Honghui Hospital · CNXi’an University of Posts and Telecommunications · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some evidence suggests that bone health can be regulated by gut microbiota. To better understand this, we performed 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing to analyze the intestinal microbial diversity in primary osteoporosis (OP) patients, osteopenia (ON) patients and normal controls (NC). We observed an inverse correlation between the number of bacterial taxa and the value of bone mineral density. The diversity estimators in the OP and ON groups were increased compared with those in the NC group. Beta diversity analyses based on hierarchical clustering and principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) could discriminate the NC samples from OP and ON samples. Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria constituted the four dominant phyla in all samples. Proportion of Firmicutes was significantly higher and Bacteroidetes was significantly lower in OP samples than that in NC samples (

Indexed as

16S ribosomal RNABone mineral densityDiversity analysisGut microbiotaOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID28630804
PMCPMC5474093
OpenAlexW2624855391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.