Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28630738›Full record

ArticleJournal of hip preservation surgery2017

Outcomes of heterotopic ossification excision following revision hip arthroscopy.

John M Redmond, Molly A Keegan, Asheesh Gupta, Jacob R Worsham, Jon E Hammarstedt, Benjamin G Domb

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hip preservation surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A microCT-based platform to quantify drug targeting.European radiology experimental · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Heterotopic Ossification in Hip Arthroscopy: an Updated Review.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

John M RedmondSoutheast Orthopedic Specialists, 6500 Bowden Road, Suite 103, Jacksonville, FL 32216, USA.
Molly A KeeganDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Asheesh GuptaHinsdale Orthopaedics, American Hip Institute, 1010 Executive Ct Suite 250, Westmont, IL 60559, USA.
Jacob R WorshamDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UF Health Jacksonville, 655 West 8th Street, 2nd Floor ACC, Jacksonville, FL 32209, USA.
Jon E HammarstedtHinsdale Orthopaedics, American Hip Institute, 1010 Executive Ct Suite 250, Westmont, IL 60559, USA.
Benjamin G DombHinsdale Orthopaedics, American Hip Institute, 1010 Executive Ct Suite 250, Westmont, IL 60559, USA.
American Hip Institute · USMayo Clinic · USUniversity of Florida Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study reviewed pain and outcome scores of patients undergoing revision surgery with heterotopic ossification (HO) excision following previous hip arthroscopy. The aim was to determine if performing the excision arthroscopically improved clinical outcomes. Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed in patients who had HO removed arthroscopically between February 2008 and 2014. Four patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures were collected: Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Non-Arthritis Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score-Activity of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) and Sport-Specific (HOS-SS) subscales. Minimum 1.5 year follow-up from index procedure was available for 23 patients (mean age = 38.6 years). Of the 23 patients who had revision surgery and HO removal, 19 (83%) were available for follow-up. Prior to revision, the average mHHS was 53.4, HOS-ADL 51.4, HOS-SS 24.5, NAHS 50.3 and VAS 6.7. Following revision with HO excision, each score had improved with an average mHHS of 73.62, HOS-ADL of 68.88, HOS SS of 58.51, NAHS of 70.83 and VAS of 4.33. Overall, mHHS increased by 20.26 points (

Identifiers

PMID28630738
PMCPMC5467417
OpenAlexW2606643310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.