Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28630722›Full record

ArticleJournal of hip preservation surgery2017

Hip arthroscopy protocol: expert opinions on post-operative weight bearing and return to sports guidelines.

Ehud Rath, Zachary T Sharfman, Matan Paret, Eyal Amar, Michael Drexler, Nicolas Bonin

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hip preservation surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05256628 (Early Versus Delayed Weightbearing in FemoroAcetabular Impingement Syndrome Patients Undergoing Treatment With Arthroscopic HIP Osteochondroplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05256628 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Early Versus Delayed Weightbearing in FemoroAcetabular Impingement Syndrome Patients Undergoing Treatment With Arthroscopic HIP Osteochondroplasty: a Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorWomen's College HospitalRan2022 to 2024Enrolled240ConditionsFemoroacetabular Impingement SyndromeArmsEarly Weightbearing, Protected Weightbearing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Return to Play After Femoroacetabular Impingement.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Graft choices for acetabular labral reconstruction.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ehud RathDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine,Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Zachary T SharfmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine,Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Matan ParetDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine,Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Eyal AmarDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine,Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Michael DrexlerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine,Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Nicolas BoninLyon Ortho Clinic, Clinique de la sauvegarde, 25 B avenue des sources, Lyon 69009, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to survey the weight-bearing limitation practices and delay for returning to running and impact sports of high volume hip arthroscopy orthopedic surgeons. The study was designed in the form of expert survey questionnaire. Evidence-based data are scares regarding hip arthroscopy post-operative weight-bearing protocols. An international cross-sectional anonymous Internet survey of 26 high-volume hip arthroscopy specialized surgeons was conducted to report their weight-bearing limitations and rehabilitation protocols after various arthroscopic hip procedures. The International Society of Hip Arthroscopy invited this study. The results were examined in the context of supporting literature to inform the studies suggestions. Four surgeons always allow immediate weight bearing and five never offer immediate weight bearing. Seventeen surgeons provide weight bearing depending on the procedures performed: 17 surgeons allowed immediate weight bearing after labral resection, 10 after labral repair and 8 after labral reconstruction. Sixteen surgeons allow immediate weight bearing after psoas tenotomy. Twenty-one respondents restrict weight bearing after microfracture procedures for 3-8 weeks post-operatively. Return to running and impact sports were shorter for labral procedures and bony procedures and longer for cartilaginous and capsular procedures. Marked variability exists in the post-operative weight-bearing practices of hip arthroscopy surgeons. This study suggests that most surgeons allow immediate weight bearing as tolerated after labral resection, acetabular osteoplasty, chondroplasty and psoas tenotomy. For cartilage defect procedures, 6 weeks or more non-weight bearing is suggested depending on the area of the defect and lateral central edge angle. Delayed return to sports activities is suggested after microfracture procedures. The level of evidence was Level V expert opinions.

Identifiers

PMID28630722
PMCPMC5467404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.