Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28630601›Full record

ReviewJournal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition2017

International society of sports nutrition position stand: diets and body composition.

Alan A Aragon, Brad J Schoenfeld, Robert Wildman, Susan Kleiner, Trisha VanDusseldorp, Lem Taylor, Conrad P Earnest, Paul J Arciero, Colin Wilborn, Douglas S Kalman and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 143 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
143citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

143 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 285 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

83 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Alan A AragonDepartment of Family and Consumer Sciences, California State University, Northridge, CA USA.
Brad J SchoenfeldDepartment of Health Sciences, Lehman College, Bronx, NY USA.
Robert WildmanDymatize Nutrition, Dallas, TX USA.
Susan KleinerHigh Performance Nutrition, Mercer Island, WA USA.
Trisha VanDusseldorpDepartment of Exercise Science and Sport Management, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA USA.
Lem TaylorDepartment of Exercise and Sports Science, University of Mary Hardin-Baylor, Belton, TX USA.
Conrad P EarnestExercise and Sports Nutrition Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX USA.
Paul J ArcieroHealth and Exercise Science, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY USA.
Colin WilbornDepartment of Exercise and Sports Science, University of Mary Hardin-Baylor, Belton, TX USA.
Douglas S KalmanNutrition Research Division, QPS, Miami, FL USA.
Jeffrey R StoutInstitute of Exercise Physiology and Wellness, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL USA.
Darryn S WilloughbyDepartment of Health, Human Performance and Recreation, Baylor University, Waco, TX USA.
Bill CampbellPerformance & Physique Enhancement Laboratory, Exercise Science Program, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL USA.
Shawn M ArentDepartment of Kinesiology & Health, IFNH Center for Health & Human Performance, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ USA.
Laurent BannockGuru Performance Institute, Norwich, UK.
Abbie E Smith-RyanDepartment of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA.
Jose AntonioDepartment of Health and Human Performance, Nova Southeastern University, Davie, FL USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8930-1058
Nova Southeastern University · USUniversity of Mary Hardin–Baylor · USBaylor University · USCalifornia State University, Northridge · USKennesaw State University · USLehman College · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USSoutheastern University · USUniversity of Central Florida · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Position Statement: The International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN) bases the following position stand on a critical analysis of the literature regarding the effects of diet types (macronutrient composition; eating styles) and their influence on body composition. The ISSN has concluded the following. 1) There is a multitude of diet types and eating styles, whereby numerous subtypes fall under each major dietary archetype. 2) All body composition assessment methods have strengths and limitations. 3) Diets primarily focused on fat loss are driven by a sustained caloric deficit. The higher the baseline body fat level, the more aggressively the caloric deficit may be imposed. Slower rates of weight loss can better preserve lean mass (LM) in leaner subjects. 4) Diets focused primarily on accruing LM are driven by a sustained caloric surplus to facilitate anabolic processes and support increasing resistance-training demands. The composition and magnitude of the surplus, as well as training status of the subjects can influence the nature of the gains. 5) A wide range of dietary approaches (low-fat to low-carbohydrate/ketogenic, and all points between) can be similarly effective for improving body composition. 6) Increasing dietary protein to levels significantly beyond current recommendations for athletic populations may result in improved body composition. Higher protein intakes (2.3-3.1 g/kg FFM) may be required to maximize muscle retention in lean, resistance-trained subjects under hypocaloric conditions. Emerging research on very high protein intakes (>3 g/kg) has demonstrated that the known thermic, satiating, and LM-preserving effects of dietary protein might be amplified in resistance-training subjects. 7) The collective body of intermittent caloric restriction research demonstrates no significant advantage over daily caloric restriction for improving body composition. 8) The long-term success of a diet depends upon compliance and suppression or circumvention of mitigating factors such as adaptive thermogenesis. 9) There is a paucity of research on women and older populations, as well as a wide range of untapped permutations of feeding frequency and macronutrient distribution at various energetic balances combined with training. Behavioral and lifestyle modification strategies are still poorly researched areas of weight management.

Indexed as

Body CompositionDietCaloric RestrictionDietary ProteinsHumansResistance TrainingSocieties, ScientificSports Nutritional SciencesDietary Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28630601
PMCPMC5470183
OpenAlexW2623985649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.