Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28630564›Full record

ArticleApplied bionics and biomechanics2017

CathROB: A Highly Compact and Versatile Remote Catheter Navigation System.

Laura Cercenelli, Barbara Bortolani, Emanuela Marcelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied bionics and biomechanics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Current State of Robotics in Interventional Radiology.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Remote vascular interventional surgery robotics: a literature review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura CercenelliLaboratory of Bioengineering, Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7818-1356
Barbara BortolaniLaboratory of Bioengineering, Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1240-9391
Emanuela MarcelliLaboratory of Bioengineering, Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5897-003X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several remote catheter navigation systems have been developed and are now commercially available. However, these systems typically require specialized catheters or equipment, as well as time-consuming operations for the system set-up. In this paper, we present CathROB, a highly compact and versatile robotic system for remote navigation of standard tip-steerable electrophysiology (EP) catheters. Key features of CathROB include an extremely compact design that minimizes encumbrance and time for system set-up in a standard cath lab, a force-sensing mechanism, an intuitive command interface, and functions for automatic catheter navigation and repositioning. We report in vitro and in vivo animal evaluation of CathROB. In vitro results showed good accuracy in remote catheter navigation and automatic repositioning (1.5 ± 0.6 mm for the left-side targets, 1.7 ± 0.4 mm for the right-side targets). Adequate tissue contact was achieved with remote navigation in vivo. There were no adverse events, including absence of cardiac perforation or cardiac damage, indicative of the safety profile of CathROB. Although further preclinical and clinical studies are required, the presented CathROB system seems to be a promising solution for an affordable and easy-to-use remote catheter navigation.

Identifiers

PMID28630564
PMCPMC5463108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.