Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28630459›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2017

Abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue cellularity in men and women.

D P Andersson, E Arner, D E Hogling, M Rydén, P Arner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Is Adipose Tissue Inflammation the Culprit of Obesity-Associated Comorbidities?Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

D P AnderssonDepartment of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
E ArnerDepartment of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
D E HoglingDepartment of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
M RydénDepartment of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
P ArnerDepartment of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectiveDifferences in subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue (SAT) fat cell size and number (cellularity) are linked to insulin resistance. Men are generally more insulin resistant than women but it is unknown whether there is a gender dimorphism in SAT cellularity. The objective was to determine SAT cellularity and its relationship to insulin sensitivity in men and women.

methodsIn a cohort study performed at an outpatient academic clinic in Sweden, 798 women and 306 men were included. Estimated SAT mass (ESAT) was derived from measures of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and a formula. SAT biopsies were obtained to measure mean fat cell size; SAT adipocyte number was obtained by dividing ESAT with mean fat cell weight. Fat cell size was also compared with level of insulin sensitivity in vivo.

resultsOver the entire range of body mass index (BMI) both fat cell size and number correlated positively with ESAT in either sex. On average, fat cell size was larger in men than in women, which was driven by significantly larger fat cells in non-obese men compared with non-obese women; no gender effect on fat cell size was seen in obese subjects. For all subjects fat cell number was larger in women than men, which was driven by a gender effect among non-obese individuals (P<0.0001). The relationship between fat cell size and insulin resistance was significant in both genders (P<0.0001) but steeper in men than in women (F=19, P<0.0001).

conclusionsAlthough both fat cell size and number determine SAT mass, adipocyte number contributes more and size less in women than in men and this is most evident in non-obese subjects. Over the entire BMI range, fat cell size contributes stronger to insulin resistance in men.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdipocytesAdolescentAdultAgedBody CompositionBody Fat DistributionBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansInsulin ResistanceMaleMiddle AgedSubcutaneous Fat, AbdominalSweden

Identifiers

PMID28630459
OpenAlexW2657656160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.