Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28630310›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Group augmentation, collective action, and territorial boundary patrols by male chimpanzees.

Kevin E Langergraber, David P Watts, Linda Vigilant, John C Mitani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The evolution of division of labour: preconditions and evolutionary feedback.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Reproductive inequality among males in the genusPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Characterization ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  16. Parochial cooperation in wild chimpanzees: a model to explain the evolution of parochial altruism.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Leaders of war: modelling the evolution of conflict among heterogeneous groups.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  18. Correlates of individual participation in boundary patrols by male chimpanzees.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kevin E LangergraberSchool of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287; kevin.langergraber@asu.edu.
David P WattsDepartment of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.
Linda VigilantPrimatology Department, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4509-1260
John C MitaniDepartment of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.

Funding

Cumulative Life Course Effects on Aging and Health in a Long-Lived Primate ModelR37AG049395 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI Elizabeth Vinson Lonsdorf, Melissa Emery Thompson · 2022 to 2026
$3.2M
Biodemography of Aging in Wild ChimpanzeesR01AG049395 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI MITANI, JOHN CARY, ROSATI, ALEXANDRA G · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG049395NIA NIH HHS R37 AG049395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How can collective action evolve when individuals benefit from cooperation regardless of whether they pay its participation costs? According to one influential perspective, collective action problems are common, especially when groups are large, but may be solved when individuals who have more to gain from the collective good or can produce it at low costs provide it to others as a byproduct. Several results from a 20-y study of one of the most striking examples of collective action in nonhuman animals, territorial boundary patrolling by male chimpanzees, are consistent with these ideas. Individuals were more likely to patrol when (

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalSexual Behavior, AnimalTerritorialityAnimalsBiological EvolutionCooperative BehaviorFemaleMalePan troglodytesPrimatesProbabilitySocial BehaviorUgandaVocalization, Animalchimpanzeescollective actioncooperationPan troglodytesterritoriality

Identifiers

PMID28630310
PMCPMC5514721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.