Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28630293›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

A null model for microbial diversification.

Timothy J Straub, Olga Zhaxybayeva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Timothy J StraubDepartment of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755.
Olga ZhaxybayevaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755; olgazh@dartmouth.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1809-3909

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether prokaryotes (Bacteria and Archaea) are naturally organized into phenotypically and genetically cohesive units comparable to animal or plant species remains contested, frustrating attempts to estimate how many such units there might be, or to identify the ecological roles they play. Analyses of gene sequences in various closely related prokaryotic groups reveal that sequence diversity is typically organized into distinct clusters, and processes such as periodic selection and extensive recombination are understood to be drivers of cluster formation ("speciation"). However, observed patterns are rarely compared with those obtainable with simple null models of diversification under stochastic lineage birth and death and random genetic drift. Via a combination of simulations and analyses of core and phylogenetic marker genes, we show that patterns of diversity for the genera

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenes, BacterialGenetic DriftAnimalsBacterial Typing TechniquesBiodiversityBorreliaCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationEscherichiaGenetic SpeciationGenetic VariationHelicobacter pyloriModels, GeneticNeisseriaPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sbacterial speciesgenetic driftneutral evolutionpathogen typingprokaryotic diversity

Identifiers

PMID28630293
PMCPMC5502593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.