Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28630252›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017

Alpha-Band Brain Oscillations Shape the Processing of Perceptible as well as Imperceptible Somatosensory Stimuli during Selective Attention.

Norman Forschack, Till Nierhaus, Matthias M Müller, Arno Villringer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Rhythmic Fluctuations in Tactile Attention.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Neuronal correlates of the subjective experience of attention.The European journal of neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Temporal Signatures of Criticality in Human Cortical Excitability as Probed by Early Somatosensory Responses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  19. Heart-brain interactions shape somatosensory perception and evoked potentials.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Norman ForschackMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, 04103 Leipzig, Germany, forschack@cbs.mpg.de villringer@cbs.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2525-7059
Till NierhausMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0906-592X
Matthias M MüllerDepartment of Psychology, University of Leipzig, 04109 Leipzig, Germany.
Arno VillringerMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, 04103 Leipzig, Germany, forschack@cbs.mpg.de villringer@cbs.mpg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention filters and weights sensory information according to behavioral demands. Stimulus-related neural responses are increased for the attended stimulus. Does alpha-band activity mediate this effect and is it restricted to conscious sensory events (suprathreshold), or does it also extend to unconscious stimuli (subthreshold)? To address these questions, we recorded EEG in healthy male and female volunteers undergoing subthreshold and suprathreshold somatosensory electrical stimulation to the left or right index finger. The task was to detect stimulation at the randomly alternated cued index finger. Under attention, amplitudes of somatosensory evoked potentials increased 50-60 ms after stimulation (P1) for both suprathreshold and subthreshold events. Prestimulus amplitude of peri-Rolandic alpha, that is mu, showed an inverse relationship to P1 amplitude during attention compared to when the finger was unattended. Interestingly, intermediate and high amplitudes of mu rhythm were associated with the highest P1 amplitudes during attention and smallest P1 during lack of attention, that is, these levels of alpha rhythm seemed to optimally support the behavioral goal ("detect" stimuli at the cued finger while ignoring the other finger). Our results show that attention enhances neural processing for both suprathreshold and subthreshold stimuli and they highlight a rather complex interaction between attention, Rolandic alpha activity, and their effects on stimulus processing.

Indexed as

AdultAlpha RhythmAttentional BiasElectric StimulationElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryFemaleHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceSensory ThresholdsSomatosensory CortexYoung Adultelectroencephalographylinear mixed effects modelingmu-alpha oscillationssomatosensory evoked potentialsspatial selective attentionsubthreshold electrical stimulation

Identifiers

PMID28630252
PMCPMC6705724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.