Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28630153›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017

Membrane-spanning α-helical barrels as tractable protein-design targets.

Ai Niitsu, Jack W Heal, Kerstin Fauland, Andrew R Thomson, Derek N Woolfson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Coiled coils 9-to-5: rationalChemical science · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Membrane pores: from structure and assembly, to medicine and technology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ai NiitsuSchool of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock's Close, Bristol BS8 1TS, UK.
Jack W HealSchool of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock's Close, Bristol BS8 1TS, UK.
Kerstin FaulandSchool of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock's Close, Bristol BS8 1TS, UK.
Andrew R ThomsonSchool of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock's Close, Bristol BS8 1TS, UK.
Derek N WoolfsonSchool of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock's Close, Bristol BS8 1TS, UK d.n.woolfson@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0394-3202

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L01386X/1European Research Council 340764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rational (

Indexed as

Protein EngineeringMembrane ProteinsProtein Conformation, alpha-HelicalMembrane Proteinscoiled coilde novo protein designtransmembrane proteinsα-helical barrel

Identifiers

PMID28630153
PMCPMC5483516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.