Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28630078›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2018

What Are the Primary Limitations in B-Cell Affinity Maturation, and How Much Affinity Maturation Can We Drive with Vaccination? A Role for Antibody Feedback.

Kai-Michael Toellner, Daniel M-Y Sze, Yang Zhang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Memory B cells.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Immune cells use active tugging forces to distinguish affinity and accelerate evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Features of B Cell Responses Relevant to Allergic Disease.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kai-Michael ToellnerInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Daniel M-Y SzeSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora 3083, Australia.
Yang ZhangInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
University of Birmingham · GBRMIT University · AU

Funding

Medical Research Council G1001390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We discuss the impact of antibody feedback on affinity maturation of B cells. Competition from epitope-specific antibodies produced earlier during the immune response leads to immune complex formation, which is essential for transport and deposition of antigen onto follicular dendritic cells (FDCs). It also reduces the concentration of free epitopes into the μm to nm range, which is essential for B-cell receptors (BCRs) to sense affinity-dependent changes in binding capacity. Antibody feedback may also induce epitope spreading, leading to a broader selection of epitopes recognized by newly emerging B-cell clones. This may be exploitable, providing ways to manipulate epitope usage induced by vaccination.

Indexed as

Antibody AffinityVaccinationAntigensB-LymphocytesFeedback, PhysiologicalAntigens

Identifiers

PMID28630078
PMCPMC5932584
OpenAlexW2693873977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.