Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28630057›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2017

Characteristics of children who do not attend their hospital appointments, and GPs' response: a mixed methods study in primary and secondary care.

Lydia Rm French, Katrina M Turner, Hannah Morley, Lisa Goldsworthy, Debbie J Sharp, Julian Hamilton-Shield

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Absenteeism in child health services: a systematic review.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Child not brought to appointment.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lydia Rm FrenchCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol.
Katrina M TurnerCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol.
Hannah MorleyCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol.
Lisa GoldsworthyBristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol.
Debbie J SharpCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol.
Julian Hamilton-ShieldSchool of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, and Bristol NIHR Biomedical Research Unit in Nutrition, Bristol.
Bristol Royal Hospital for Children · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren who do not attend (DNA) their hospital outpatient appointments are a concern because this potentially compromises the child's health and incurs financial cost. Little is known about children who DNA or the views of GPs to non-attendance.

aimTo describe the characteristics of children who DNA hospital paediatric outpatient appointments, and explore how GPs view and respond to DNAs. DESIGN AND

settingA mixed methods study of data from all new referrals to a children's hospital in the South West of England between 1 September and 31 October 2012.

methodData were extracted from patients' hospital and GP records, and Stata was used to analyse the data quantitatively. Analysis focused on describing the characteristics of children who DNA, and the process of care that followed. Practices that had either the highest or lowest number of DNAs were purposefully sampled for GPs who had referred children to secondary care at the study hospital within the previous year. Interviews were held between May 2014 and July 2015, and were analysed thematically.

resultsChildren who DNA are more likely to be from an area of greater deprivation (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00 to 1.02,

conclusionNon-attendance at hospital outpatient appointments may indicate a child's welfare is at risk. Communication between primary and secondary care needs to be improved, and guidelines developed to encourage GPs to monitor children who DNA.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesAttitude of Health PersonnelGeneral PracticeOutpatient Clinics, HospitalAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolChild WelfareEnglandFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInterdisciplinary CommunicationMaleappointments and schedulesattitude of health personnelchild welfareno-show patientsprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID28630057
PMCPMC5565855
OpenAlexW2628536629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.