Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28629891›Full record

ArticlePain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses2017

A New Clinical Pain Knowledge Test for Nurses: Development and Psychometric Evaluation.

Esther I Bernhofer, Barbara St Marie, James F Bena

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Assessing Patients' Risk for Opioid Use Disorder.AACN advanced critical care · 2019
    Article
  5. Psychometric Evaluation of the Nursing OutcomeInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  6. Scientometric overview of nursing research on pain management.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Esther I BernhoferCleveland Clinic, Office of Nursing Research and Innovation, Cleveland, Ohio. Electronic address: bernhoe@ccf.org.
Barbara St MarieUniversity of Iowa, College of Nursing, Iowa City, Iowa.
James F BenaCleveland Clinic, Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland, Ohio.
Cleveland Clinic · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Decision Support for Responsible Pain Management (DS-RPM)K23DA043049 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ST MARIE, BARBARA JEAN · 2017 to 2020
$595k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA043049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All nurses care for patients with pain, and pain management knowledge and attitude surveys for nurses have been around since 1987. However, no validated knowledge test exists to measure postlicensure clinicians' knowledge of the core competencies of pain management in current complex patient populations. To develop and test the psychometric properties of an instrument designed to measure pain management knowledge of postlicensure nurses. Psychometric instrument validation. Four large Midwestern U.S. hospitals. Registered nurses employed full time and part time August 2015 to April 2016, aged M = 43.25 years; time as RN, M = 16.13 years. Prospective survey design using e-mail to invite nurses to take an electronic multiple choice pain knowledge test. Content validity of initial 36-item test "very good" (95.1% agreement). Completed tests that met analysis criteria, N = 747. Mean initial test score, 69.4% correct (range 27.8-97.2). After revision/removal of 13 unacceptable questions, mean test score was 50.4% correct (range 8.7-82.6). Initial test item percent difficulty range was 15.2%-98.1%; discrimination values range, 0.03-0.50; final test item percent difficulty range, 17.6%-91.1%, discrimination values range, -0.04 to 1.04. Split-half reliability final test was 0.66. A high decision consistency reliability was identified, with test cut-score of 75%. The final 23-item Clinical Pain Knowledge Test has acceptable discrimination, difficulty, decision consistency, reliability, and validity in the general clinical inpatient nurse population. This instrument will be useful in assessing pain management knowledge of clinical nurses to determine gaps in education, evaluate knowledge after pain management education, and measure research outcomes.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMidwestern United StatesNursesPainPain ManagementProspective StudiesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID28629891
PMCPMC7061765
OpenAlexW2624836362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.