ArticlePrimary health care research & development2017
The collaboration of general practitioners and nurses in primary care: a comparative analysis of concepts and practices in Slovenia and Spain.
Article in Primary health care research & development, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of doctor-nurse substitution strategies in primary care: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Development of an interprofessional person-centred care concept for persons with care needs living in their own homes in Germany (interprof HOME): a mixed methods study.BMC primary care · 2025Trial
- "Exploring vertical task shifting: perceptions and experiences of nurses and general practitioners in Norwegian general practice - a qualitative study".Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- Thirty years of the Family Health Strategy in the Brazilian Unified National Health System: milestones, advances, setbacks and challenges.Cadernos de saude publica · 2026Article
- Seeds of change: First assessment of an interprofessional training for medical and nursing students through INITIAL ("INnovative InTerprofessIonAl Learning in primary care"): A mixed-method evaluation.GMS journal for medical education · 2026Article
- Task sharing for the management of non-communicable diseases in a humanitarian setting: An innovative approach in a low-middle income country (LMIC).Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis Methodologies in Nursing Research: A Scoping Review.Nursing open · 2025Article
- "Well, it's very doctor-related" - interprofessional communication and collaboration between GP practices and nurses in the ambulant setting: a qualitative study in southern Germany.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Australian practice nurses' perspectives on integrating specialist diabetes care with primary care: a qualitative study.Family practice · 2025Article
- Article
- The impact of remuneration, extrinsic and intrinsic incentives on interprofessional primary care teams: results from a rapid scoping review.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Interprofessional collaboration in the home care setting: perspectives of people receiving home care, relatives, nurses, general practitioners, and therapists-results of a qualitative analysis.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Challenges and opportunities in strengthening primary mental healthcare for older people in India: a qualitative stakeholder analysis.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Development of an interprofessional person-centred care concept for persons with care needs living in their own homes (BMJ open · 2023Article
- Continuity and care coordination of primary health care: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Facilitators and barriers in general practitioners' choice to work in primary care units in Austria: a qualitative study.Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2023Article
- Teaching interprofessional collaboration among future healthcare professionals.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Challenges and opportunities for educating health professionals after the COVID-19 pandemic.Lancet (London, England) · 2022Review
- How do nurses support chronically ill clients' participation and self-management in primary care? A cross-country qualitative study.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim A comparative analysis of concepts and practices of GP-nurse collaborations in primary health centres in Slovenia and Spain.
backgroundCross-professional collaboration is considered a key element for providing high-quality comprehensive care by combining the expertise of various professions. In many countries, nurses are also being given new and more extensive responsibilities. Implemented concepts of collaborative care need to be analysed within the context of care concepts, organisational structures, and effective collaboration.
methodsBackground review of primary care concepts (literature analysis, expert interviews), and evaluation of collaboration in 'best practice' health centres in certain regions of Slovenia and Spain. Qualitative content analysis of expert interviews, presentations, observations, and group discussions with professionals and health centre managers. Findings In Slovenian health centres, the collaboration between GPs and nurses has been strongly shaped by their organisation in separate care units and predominantly case-oriented functions. Conventional power structures between professions hinder effective collaboration. The introduction of a new cross-professional primary care concept has integrated advanced practice nurses into general practice. Conventional hierarchies still exist, but a shared vision of preventive care is gradually strengthening attitudes towards team-oriented care. Formal regulations or incentives for teamwork have yet to be implemented. In Spain, health centres were established along with a team-based care concept that encompasses close physician-nurse collaboration and an autonomous role for nurses in the care process. Nurses collaborate with GPs on more equal terms with conflicts centring on professional disagreements. Team development structures and financial incentives for team achievements have been implemented, encouraging teams to generate their own strategies to improve teamwork.
conclusionClearly defined structures, shared visions of care and team development are important for implementing and maintaining a good collaboration. Central prerequisites are advanced nursing education and greater acceptance of advanced nursing practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.