ArticlePublic health nutrition2017
Characterisation of vitamin and mineral supplement users differentiated according to their motives for using supplements: results of the German National Nutrition Monitoring (NEMONIT).
Article in Public health nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors related to supplementation use and self-reported vitamin deficiency in the palestinian society.BMC research notes · 2026Article
- Article
- Dietary Intake of Micronutrients and Use of Vitamin and/or Mineral Supplements: Brazilian National Food Survey.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Eating habits and dietary supplement utilization according to food-related lifestyle among Korean adults: a cross-sectional study.Korean journal of community nutrition · 2024Article
- Is Dietary (Food) Supplement Intake Reported in European National Nutrition Surveys?Nutrients · 2023Review
- Assessment of Nutrient Intake and Diet Quality in Adolescent Dietary Supplement Users vs. Non-Users: The CRO-PALS Longitudinal Study.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Fish oil users of Greece: Predictors, knowledge and habits regarding dietary supplement use.AIMS public health · 2023Article
- Prevalence, Determinants, and Consumer Stance towards Dietary Supplements According to Sex in a Large Greek Sample: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Dietary Supplements Use among Serbian Undergraduate Students of Different Academic Fields.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Article
- Use of Dietary Supplements and Perceived Knowledge among Adults Living with Fibromyalgia in Norway: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nutrients · 2021Article
- The Prevalence and Awareness Concerning Dietary Supplement Use among Saudi Adolescents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Vitamin Substitution Beyond Childhood—Requirements and RisksDeutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020Review
- Self-Selection Bias: An Essential Design Consideration for Nutrition Trials in Healthy Populations.Frontiers in nutrition · 2020Article
- Concomitant Use of Dietary Supplements and Medicines among Preschool and School-Aged Children in Japan.Nutrients · 2019Article
- Use of vitamin and mineral supplements among adolescents living in Germany-Results from EsKiMo II.Nutrients · 2019Article
- No association between vitamin C and E supplementation and grip strength over 5 years: the Colaus study.European journal of nutrition · 2019Article
- Knowledge Concerning Dietary Supplements among General Public.BioMed research international · 2019Article
- Vitamin and Mineral Supplement Use among Korean Adults: Baseline Data from the Trace Element Study of Korean Adults in Yeungnam Area.Nutrients · 2018Article
- Habits and beliefs related to food supplements: Results of a survey among Italian students of different education fields and levels.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo characterise German vitamin and mineral supplement users differentiated by their motives for supplement use.
designData were obtained from the German National Nutrition Monitoring (2010/11) via two 24 h dietary recalls and a telephone interview. Motive-based subgroups of supplement users were identified by factor and cluster analysis. Sociodemographic, lifestyle, health and dietary characteristics and supplement use were examined. Differences were analysed using χ 2 tests, logistic and linear regression models.
settingGermany, nationwide. SUBJECTS: Individuals (n 1589) aged 18-80 years.
resultsThree motive-based subgroups were identified: a 'Prevention' subgroup (n 324), characterised by the motive to prevent nutrient deficiencies; a 'Prevention and additional benefits' subgroup (n 166), characterised by motives to prevent health problems and improve well-being and performance; and a 'Treatment' subgroup (n 136), characterised by motives to treat nutrient deficiencies or diseases. Members of the two prevention subgroups had a higher Healthy Eating Index score and tended to be more physically active than non-users. Those in the 'Prevention and additional benefits' subgroup supplemented with a greater number of micronutrients. Members of the 'Treatment' subgroup tended to be older and have a lower self-reported health status than non-users, and supplemented with a smaller number of micronutrients.
conclusionsThe majority of supplement users take supplements for preventive purposes and they are more health conscious than non-users of supplements due to their concerns about developing health problems. Those supplementing for treatment purposes may have underlying health indications and may be more likely to benefit from supplementation than those supplementing for preventive purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.