Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28629485›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2017

Characterisation of vitamin and mineral supplement users differentiated according to their motives for using supplements: results of the German National Nutrition Monitoring (NEMONIT).

Anne Frey, Ingrid Hoffmann, Thorsten Heuer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dietary Supplements Use among Serbian Undergraduate Students of Different Academic Fields.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Prevalence and Awareness Concerning Dietary Supplement Use among Saudi Adolescents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  13. Vitamin Substitution Beyond Childhood—Requirements and RisksDeutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anne FreyDepartment of Nutritional Behaviour,Max Rubner-Institut,Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and Food,Haid-und-Neu-Strasse 9,76131 Karlsruhe,Germany.
Ingrid HoffmannDepartment of Nutritional Behaviour,Max Rubner-Institut,Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and Food,Haid-und-Neu-Strasse 9,76131 Karlsruhe,Germany.
Thorsten HeuerDepartment of Nutritional Behaviour,Max Rubner-Institut,Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and Food,Haid-und-Neu-Strasse 9,76131 Karlsruhe,Germany.
Max Rubner Institut · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo characterise German vitamin and mineral supplement users differentiated by their motives for supplement use.

designData were obtained from the German National Nutrition Monitoring (2010/11) via two 24 h dietary recalls and a telephone interview. Motive-based subgroups of supplement users were identified by factor and cluster analysis. Sociodemographic, lifestyle, health and dietary characteristics and supplement use were examined. Differences were analysed using χ 2 tests, logistic and linear regression models.

settingGermany, nationwide. SUBJECTS: Individuals (n 1589) aged 18-80 years.

resultsThree motive-based subgroups were identified: a 'Prevention' subgroup (n 324), characterised by the motive to prevent nutrient deficiencies; a 'Prevention and additional benefits' subgroup (n 166), characterised by motives to prevent health problems and improve well-being and performance; and a 'Treatment' subgroup (n 136), characterised by motives to treat nutrient deficiencies or diseases. Members of the two prevention subgroups had a higher Healthy Eating Index score and tended to be more physically active than non-users. Those in the 'Prevention and additional benefits' subgroup supplemented with a greater number of micronutrients. Members of the 'Treatment' subgroup tended to be older and have a lower self-reported health status than non-users, and supplemented with a smaller number of micronutrients.

conclusionsThe majority of supplement users take supplements for preventive purposes and they are more health conscious than non-users of supplements due to their concerns about developing health problems. Those supplementing for treatment purposes may have underlying health indications and may be more likely to benefit from supplementation than those supplementing for preventive purposes.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsDiet SurveysAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesDietFemaleGermanyHealth StatusHumansLife StyleMaleMicronutrientsMicronutrientsCharacteristicsDietary supplementsGerman populationMotivesNEMONIT

Identifiers

PMID28629485
PMCPMC10261379
OpenAlexW2643449248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.