Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28629365›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2017

Evaluation and improvement of the regulatory inference for large co-expression networks with limited sample size.

Wenbin Guo, Cristiane P G Calixto, Nikoleta Tzioutziou, Ping Lin, Robbie Waugh, John W S Brown, Runxuan Zhang

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Drug vector representation: a tool for drug similarity analysis.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wenbin GuoInformation and Computational Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, Scotland, DD2 5DA, UK.
Cristiane P G CalixtoPlant Sciences Division, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Invergowrie, Dundee, Scotland, DD2 5DA, UK.
Nikoleta TzioutziouPlant Sciences Division, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Invergowrie, Dundee, Scotland, DD2 5DA, UK.
Ping LinDivision of Mathematics, University of Dundee, Nethergate, Dundee, Scotland, DD1 4HN, UK.
Robbie WaughPlant Sciences Division, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Invergowrie, Dundee, Scotland, DD2 5DA, UK.
John W S BrownPlant Sciences Division, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Invergowrie, Dundee, Scotland, DD2 5DA, UK.
Runxuan ZhangInformation and Computational Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, Scotland, DD2 5DA, UK. Runxuan.zhang@hutton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7558-765X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCo-expression has been widely used to identify novel regulatory relationships using high throughput measurements, such as microarray and RNA-seq data. Evaluation studies on co-expression network analysis methods mostly focus on networks of small or medium size of up to a few hundred nodes. For large networks, simulated expression data usually consist of hundreds or thousands of profiles with different perturbations or knock-outs, which is uncommon in real experiments due to their cost and the amount of work required. Thus, the performances of co-expression network analysis methods on large co-expression networks consisting of a few thousand nodes, with only a small number of profiles with a single perturbation, which more accurately reflect normal experimental conditions, are generally uncharacterized and unknown.

methodsWe proposed a novel network inference methods based on Relevance Low order Partial Correlation (RLowPC). RLowPC method uses a two-step approach to select on the high-confidence edges first by reducing the search space by only picking the top ranked genes from an intial partial correlation analysis and, then computes the partial correlations in the confined search space by only removing the linear dependencies from the shared neighbours, largely ignoring the genes showing lower association.

resultsWe selected six co-expression-based methods with good performance in evaluation studies from the literature: Partial correlation, PCIT, ARACNE, MRNET, MRNETB and CLR. The evaluation of these methods was carried out on simulated time-series data with various network sizes ranging from 100 to 3000 nodes. Simulation results show low precision and recall for all of the above methods for large networks with a small number of expression profiles. We improved the inference significantly by refinement of the top weighted edges in the pre-inferred partial correlation networks using RLowPC. We found improved performance by partitioning large networks into smaller co-expressed modules when assessing the method performance within these modules.

conclusionsThe evaluation results show that current methods suffer from low precision and recall for large co-expression networks where only a small number of profiles are available. The proposed RLowPC method effectively reduces the indirect edges predicted as regulatory relationships and increases the precision of top ranked predictions. Partitioning large networks into smaller highly co-expressed modules also helps to improve the performance of network inference methods. The RLowPC R package for network construction, refinement and evaluation is available at GitHub: https://github.com/wyguo/RLowPC .

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksCluster AnalysisSample SizeSystems BiologyGene co-expression networksGene regulatory networksNetwork method evaluationPartial correlationSynthetic data

Identifiers

PMID28629365
PMCPMC5477119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.