Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28629325›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017

Quasi-linear score for capturing heterogeneous structure in biomarkers.

Katsuhiro Omae, Osamu Komori, Shinto Eguchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Quasi-linear Cox proportional hazards model with cross- LBMC medical research methodology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katsuhiro OmaeDepartment of Statistical Science, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, 10-3, Midoricho, Tachikawa, Tokyo, 190-8562, Japan. omae.katsuhiro@ism.ac.jp.
Osamu KomoriDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan.
Shinto EguchiDepartment of Statistical Science, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, 10-3, Midoricho, Tachikawa, Tokyo, 190-8562, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLinear scores are widely used to predict dichotomous outcomes in biomedical studies because of their learnability and understandability. Such approaches, however, cannot be used to elucidate biodiversity when there is heterogeneous structure in target population.

resultsOur study was focused on describing intrinsic heterogeneity in predictions. Because heterogeneity can be captured by a clustering method, integrating different information from different clusters should yield better predictions. Accordingly, we developed a quasi-linear score, which effectively combines the linear scores of clustered markers. We extended the linear score to the quasi-linear score by a generalized average form, the Kolmogorov-Nagumo average. We observed that two shrinkage methods worked well: ridge shrinkage for estimating the quasi-linear score, and lasso shrinkage for selecting markers within each cluster. Simulation studies and applications to real data show that the proposed method has good predictive performance compared with existing methods.

conclusionsHeterogeneous structure is captured by a clustering method. Quasi-linear scores combine such heterogeneity and have a better predictive ability compared with linear scores.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiomarkersBreast NeoplasmsCluster AnalysisDiscriminant AnalysisFemaleHumansLikelihood FunctionsLogistic ModelsNeoplasm MetastasisTranscriptomeBiomarkersDiscriminant analysisHeterogeneityKolmogorov-Nagumo averagePrediction

Identifiers

PMID28629325
PMCPMC5477283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.