Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28629234›Full record

ArticleCartilage2019

Healing of Osteochondral Defects via Endochondral Ossification in an Ovine Model.

Helen Lydon, Alan Getgood, Frances M D Henson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cartilage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. 3D Printing for Bone-Cartilage Interface Regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. "Patient reported outcomes" following experimental surgery-using telemetry to assess movement in experimental ovine models.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Helen Lydon1 Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Alan Getgood2 Fowler Kennedy Sports Medicine Clinic, London, Ontario, Canada.
Frances M D Henson1 Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBFowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to describe the mechanism of healing of osteochondral defects of the distal femur in the sheep, a commonly used translational model. Information on the healing mechanism be useful to inform the design of tissue engineering devices for joint surface defect repair.

designA retrospective study was conducted examining 7-mm diameter osteochondral defects made in the distal medial femoral condyle of 40 adult female sheep, comprising control animals from 3 separate structures. The healing of the defects was studied at post mortem at up to 26 weeks.

resultsOsteochondral defects of the distal femur of the sheep heal through endochondral ossification as evidenced by chondrocyte hypertrophy and type X collagen expression. Neocartilage is first formed adjacent to damaged cartilage and then streams over the damaged underlying bone before filling the defect from the base upward. No intramembranous ossification or isolated mesenchymal stem cell aggregates were detected in the healing tissue. No osseous hypertrophy was detected in the defects.

conclusionsOsteochondral defects of the medial femoral condyle of the sheep heal via endochondral ossification, with neocartilage first appearing adjacent to damaged cartilage. Unlike the mechanism of healing in fracture repair, neocartilage is eventually formed directly onto damaged bone. There was most variability between animals between 8 and 12 weeks postsurgery. These results should be considered when designing devices to promote defect healing.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationAnimalsCartilage, ArticularChondrocytesChondrogenesisCollagen Type XDisease Models, AnimalFemaleFemurHypertrophyOsteochondritisOsteogenesisRetrospective StudiesSheepTreatment OutcomeCollagen Type Xanimal modelscartilage repairendochondral ossificationosteochondralrepair

Identifiers

PMID28629234
PMCPMC6376560
OpenAlexW2689371263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.