Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28628707›Full record

Trial reportJAMA neurology2017

Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction and Spot Sign in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Andrea Morotti, H Bart Brouwers, Javier M Romero, Michael J Jessel, Anastasia Vashkevich, Kristin Schwab, Mohammad Rauf Afzal, Christy Cassarly, Steven M Greenberg, Renee Hebert Martin and 4 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01176565 phase3terminatednot on this map

Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage (ATACH)-II: A Phase III Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial of Blood Pressure Reduction for Hypertension in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MinnesotaRan2011 to 2016Enrolled1,000ConditionsIntracerebral HemorrhageArmsIntravenous nicardipine hydrochloride
NCT04200781 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind, Multi-center Clinical Study of Shengdi Dahuang Decoction in the Treatment of Acute Hemorrhagic Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorShuGuang HospitalRan2019 to 2022Enrolled464ConditionsHemorrhagic StrokeArmsGranules of Shengdi Dahuang Decoction, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Andrea MorottiDivision of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
H Bart BrouwersDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Javier M RomeroJ. P. Kistler Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Michael J JesselJ. P. Kistler Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Anastasia VashkevichJ. P. Kistler Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Kristin SchwabJ. P. Kistler Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Mohammad Rauf AfzalZeenat Qureshi Stroke Research Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Christy CassarlyDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Steven M GreenbergJ. P. Kistler Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Renee Hebert MartinDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Adnan I QureshiZeenat Qureshi Stroke Research Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Jonathan RosandDivision of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Joshua N GoldsteinDivision of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage II and Neurological Emergencies Treatment Trials Investigators

Funding

SCORE-IT: The CTA Spot Sign Score in Acute Cerebral HemorrhageR01NS073344 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ROSAND, JONATHAN · 2011 to 2015
$2.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The computed tomographic angiography (CTA) spot sign is associated with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) expansion and may mark those patients most likely to benefit from intensive blood pressure (BP) reduction. Objective: To investigate whether the spot sign is associated with ICH expansion across a wide range of centers and whether intensive BP reduction decreases hematoma expansion and improves outcome in patients with ICH and a spot sign. Design, Setting, and Participants: SCORE-IT (Spot Sign Score in Restricting ICH Growth) is a preplanned prospective observational study nested in the Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage II (ATACH-II) randomized clinical trial. Participants included consecutive patients with primary ICH who underwent a CTA within 8 hours from onset at 59 sites from May 15, 2011, through December 19, 2015. Data were analyzed for the present study from July 1 to August 31, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patients in ATACH-II were randomized to intensive (systolic BP target, <140 mm Hg) vs standard (systolic BP target, <180 mm Hg) BP reduction within 4.5 hours from onset. Expansion of ICH was defined as hematoma growth of greater than 33%, and an unfavorable outcome was defined as a 90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 4 or greater (range, 0-6). The association among BP reduction, ICH expansion, and outcome was investigated with multivariable logistic regression. Results: A total of 133 patients (83 men [62.4%] and 50 women [37.6%]; mean [SD] age, 61.9 [13.1] years) were included. Of these, 53 (39.8%) had a spot sign, and 24 of 123 without missing data (19.5%) experienced ICH expansion. The spot sign was associated with expansion with sensitivity of 0.54 (95% CI, 0.34-0.74) and specificity of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.53-0.72). After adjustment for potential confounders, intensive BP treatment was not associated with a significant reduction of ICH expansion (relative risk, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.27-2.51; P = .74) or improved outcome (relative risk of 90-day modified Rankin Scale score ≥4, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.53-2.91; P = .62) in spot sign-positive patients. Conclusions and Relevance: The predictive performance of the spot sign for ICH expansion was lower than in prior reports from single-center studies. No evidence suggested that patients with ICH and a spot sign specifically benefit from intensive BP reduction. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01176565.

Indexed as

AgedAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCerebral HemorrhageComputed Tomography AngiographyFemaleGlasgow Coma ScaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLogistic ModelsMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareRetrospective StudiesAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID28628707
PMCPMC5584592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.