Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28628702›Full record

Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2017

Financial Incentives for Linkage to Care and Viral Suppression Among HIV-Positive Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial (HPTN 065).

Wafaa M El-Sadr, Deborah Donnell, Geetha Beauchamp, H Irene Hall, Lucia V Torian, Barry Zingman, Garret Lum, Michael Kharfen, Richard Elion, Jason Leider and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01152918 (TLC-Plus), which is not on this map. Cited by 93 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01152918 nacompletednot on this map

TLC-Plus: A Study to Evaluate the Feasibility of an Enhanced Test, Link to Care, Plus Treat Approach for HIV Prevention in the United States

TypeinterventionalSponsorHIV Prevention Trials NetworkRan2010 to 2014Enrolled18,442ConditionsHIV InfectionArmsLinkage-to-Care Component: Financial Incentive (FI), Linkage-to-Care Component: Standard of Care (SOC), Viral Suppression Component: FI, Viral Suppression Component: SOC, Prevention for Positives Component: Counseling and SOC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Incentivizing adherence to pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention: a randomized pilot trial among male sex workers in Mexico.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Wafaa M El-SadrICAP, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Deborah DonnellVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Geetha BeauchampVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
H Irene HallDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Lucia V TorianNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York.
Barry ZingmanMontefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York.
Garret LumDistrict of Columbia Department of Health, HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis, STD and TB Administration, Washington, DC.
Michael KharfenDistrict of Columbia Department of Health, HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis, STD and TB Administration, Washington, DC.
Richard ElionGeorge Washington University, School of Medicine, Washington, DC.
Jason LeiderAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York.
Fred M GordinWashington DC VA Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Vanessa ElharrarOffice of AIDS Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
David BurnsDivision of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland.
Allison ZerbeICAP, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Theresa GambleHPTN Leadership and Operations Center, FHI360, Durham, North Carolina.
Bernard BransonScientific Affairs LLC, Atlanta, Georgia.
HPTN 065 Study Team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Achieving linkage to care and viral suppression in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients improves their well-being and prevents new infections. Current gaps in the HIV care continuum substantially limit such benefits. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of financial incentives on linkage to care and viral suppression in HIV-positive patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: A large community-based clinical trial that randomized 37 HIV test and 39 HIV care sites in the Bronx, New York, and Washington, DC, to financial incentives or standard of care. Interventions: Participants at financial incentive test sites who had positive test results for HIV received coupons redeemable for $125 cash-equivalent gift cards upon linkage to care. HIV-positive patients receiving antiretroviral therapy at financial incentive care sites received $70 gift cards quarterly, if virally suppressed. Main Outcomes and Measures: Linkage to care: proportion of HIV-positive persons at the test site who linked to care within 3 months, as indicated by CD4+ and/or viral load test results done at a care site. Viral suppression: proportion of established patients at HIV care sites with suppressed viral load (<400 copies/mL), assessed at each calendar quarter. Outcomes assessed through laboratory test results reported to the National HIV Surveillance System. Results: A total of 1061 coupons were dispensed for linkage to care at 18 financial incentive test sites and 39 359 gift cards were dispensed to 9641 HIV-positive patients eligible for gift cards at 17 financial incentive care sites. Financial incentives did not increase linkage to care (adjusted odds ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.73-1.67; P = .65). However, financial incentives significantly increased viral suppression. The overall proportion of patients with viral suppression was 3.8% higher (95% CI, 0.7%-6.8%; P = .01) at financial incentive sites compared with standard of care sites. Among patients not previously consistently virally suppressed, the proportion virally suppressed was 4.9% higher (95% CI, 1.4%-8.5%; P = .007) at financial incentive sites. In addition, continuity in care was 8.7% higher (95% CI, 4.2%-13.2%; P < .001) at financial incentive sites. Conclusions and Relevance: Financial incentives, as used in this study (HPTN 065), significantly increased viral suppression and regular clinic attendance among HIV-positive patients in care. No effect was noted on linkage to care. Financial incentives offer promise for improving adherence to treatment and viral suppression among HIV-positive patients. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01152918.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsContinuity of Patient CareHIV InfectionsMotivationViral LoadAdultFemaleHumansMaleMedication AdherencePatient Care PlanningQuality ImprovementUnited StatesAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID28628702
PMCPMC5604092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.