ArticlePloS one2017
Wave intensity of aortic root pressure as diagnostic marker of left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fluid overload modifies ambulatory blood pressure and pulse wave characteristics in hemodialysis patients undergoing targeted fluid management.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- Effects of Pre-Dialysis Fluid Overload, Intradialytic Relative Blood Volume Levels, and Cumulative Ultrafiltration Volume on Pulse Wave-Derived Features during Hemodialysis: Results from a Longitudinal Cohort Study.Kidney & blood pressure research · 2026Article
- Measures of wave intensity as a non-invasive surrogate for cardiac function predicts mortality in haemodialysis patients.Clinical kidney journal · 2024Article
- Superiority of a Representative MRI Flow Waveform over Doppler Ultrasound for Aortic Wave Reflection Assessment in Children and Adolescents With/Without a History of Heart Disease.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- Heart Failure: Insights From the Arterial Waves.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- A comparison between left ventricular ejection time measurement methods during physiological changes induced by simulated microgravity.Experimental physiology · 2022Article
- Increased Excess Pressure After Creation of an Arteriovenous Fistula in End-Stage Renal Disease.American journal of hypertension · 2022Article
- An active approach of pressure waveform matching for stress-based testing of arteries.Artificial organs · 2021Article
- Assessing Single Ventricle Function in the Fontan Circulation using Wave Intensity Analysis.Pediatric cardiology · 2021Article
- The Role of Arterial Stiffness and Central Hemodynamics in Heart Failure.International journal of heart failure · 2020Review
- Feasibility of Estimation of Aortic Wave Intensity Using Non-invasive Pressure Recordings in the Absence of Flow Velocity in Man.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Article
- Measurement, Analysis and Interpretation of Pressure/Flow Waves in Blood Vessels.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Review
- Unveiling the Vascular Mechanisms Behind Long-Term Effects of Coarctation Treatment Using Pulse Wave Dynamics.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019Article
- Pulsatile arterial haemodynamics in heart failure.European heart journal · 2018Review
- Pulse Waveform Analysis: Is It Ready for Prime Time?Current hypertension reports · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSystolic left ventricular function strongly influences the blood pressure waveform. Therefore, pressure-derived parameters might potentially be used as non-invasive, diagnostic markers of left ventricular impairment. The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of pressure-based parameters in combination with electrocardiography (ECG) for the detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction defined as severely reduced ejection fraction (EF). METHODS AND
resultsTwo populations, each comprising patients with reduced EF and pressure-matched controls, were included for the main analysis (51/102 patients) and model testing (44/88 patients). Central pressure was derived from radial readings and used to compute blood flow. Subsequently, pulse wave analysis and wave intensity analysis were performed and the ratio of the two peaks of forward intensity (SDR) was calculated as a novel index of ventricular function. SDR was significantly decreased in the reduced EF group (2.5 vs. 4.4, P<0.001), as was central pulse pressure, augmentation index and ejection duration (ED), while the QRS-duration was prolonged. SDR and ED were independent predictors of ventricular impairment and when combined with QRS in a simple decision tree, a reduced EF could be detected with a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 80%. The independent power of ED, SDR and QRS to predict reduced EF was furthermore confirmed in the test population.
conclusionThe detection or indication of reduced ejection fraction from pressure-derived parameters seems feasible. These parameters could help to improve the quality of cardiovascular risk stratification or might be used in screening strategies in the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.