Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28628193›Full record

ReviewAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2017

Modulation of epithelial cell polarity by bacterial pathogens.

Rocio Tapia, Sarah E Kralicek, Gail A Hecht

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Antimicrobial Effects ofDrug design, development and therapy · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Toxins · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. EnterohemorrhagicFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rocio TapiaDivision of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois.
Sarah E KralicekDivision of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois.
Gail A HechtDivision of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois.

Funding

Mechanisms of Enteropathogenic E. coli Effects on Polarity and Tight JunctionsR01DK097043 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI HECHT, GAIL A · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
Mechanisms of Cytoskeletal Regulation of Tight Junction Homeostasis and RepairI01BX002687 · VA · EDWARD HINES JR VA HOSPITAL · PI HECHT, GAIL A · 2016 to 2019
–
BLRD VA I01 BX002687NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK097043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epithelial cells constitute a physical barrier that aids in protecting the host from microbial pathogens. Polarized epithelial cells contain distinct apical and basolateral membrane domains separated by intercellular junctions, including tight junctions (TJs), which contribute to the maintenance of apical-basal polarity. Polarity complexes also contribute to the establishment of TJ formation. Several pathogens perturb epithelial TJ barrier function and structure in addition to causing a loss of apical-basal polarity. Here, we review the impact of pathogenic bacteria on the disruption of cell-cell junctions and epithelial polarity.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliAnimalsCell PolarityEpithelial CellsHumansMembrane ProteinsTight JunctionsMembrane Proteinsapical-basal polarityenteropathogenic Escherichia coliEPECtight junctions

Identifiers

PMID28628193
PMCPMC5713485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.