Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28627967›Full record

ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2017

Novel region of interest interrogation technique for diffusion tensor imaging analysis in the canine brain.

Jonathan Y Li, Dana M Middleton, Steven Chen, Leonard White, N Matthew Ellinwood, Patricia Dickson, Charles Vite, Allison Bradbury, James M Provenzale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jonathan Y Li1 School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Dana M Middleton1 School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Steven Chen2 Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA.
Leonard White3 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, USA.
N Matthew Ellinwood4 Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, USA.
Patricia Dickson5 Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Charles Vite6 Department of Clinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Allison Bradbury6 Department of Clinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
James M Provenzale2 Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA.

Funding

Neuroimaging and Neuropathology of Mucopolysaccharidosis IR01NS085381 · NINDS · LUNDQUIST INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER · PI DICKSON, PATRICIA I · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
Lentiviral-mediated Hematopoietic Stem Cell Gene Therapy for Canine Globoid Cell LeukodystrophyF32NS093898 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BRADBURY, ALLISON M · 2016 to 2018
$151k
NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS093898NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085381
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose We describe a novel technique for measuring diffusion tensor imaging metrics in the canine brain. We hypothesized that a standard method for region of interest placement could be developed that is highly reproducible, with less than 10% difference in measurements between raters. Methods Two sets of canine brains (three seven-week-old full-brains and two 17-week-old single hemispheres) were scanned ex-vivo on a 7T small-animal magnetic resonance imaging system. Strict region of interest placement criteria were developed and then used by two raters to independently measure diffusion tensor imaging metrics within four different white-matter regions within each specimen. Average values of fractional anisotropy, radial diffusivity, and the three eigenvalues (λ1, λ2, and λ3) within each region in each specimen overall and within each individual image slice were compared between raters by calculating the percentage difference between raters for each metric. Results The mean percentage difference between raters for all diffusion tensor imaging metrics when pooled by each region and specimen was 1.44% (range: 0.01-5.17%). The mean percentage difference between raters for all diffusion tensor imaging metrics when compared by individual image slice was 2.23% (range: 0.75-4.58%) per hemisphere. Conclusion Our results indicate that the technique described is highly reproducible, even when applied to canine specimens of differing age, morphology, and image resolution. We propose this technique for future studies of diffusion tensor imaging analysis in canine brains and for cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of canine brain models of human central nervous system disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnisotropyBrainDiffusion Tensor ImagingDogsReproducibility of ResultsWhite Mattercanine modelDiffusion tensor imaginginterrogation techniquemagnetic resonanceregion of interestreproducibility

Identifiers

PMID28627967
PMCPMC5524282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.