Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28627636›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular medicine2017

Formulation and characterization of EGCG for the treatment of superficial bladder cancer.

Katarzyna Dettlaff, Maciej Stawny, Magdalena Ogrodowczyk, Anna Jelińska, Waldemar Bednarski, Dorota Wątróbska-Świetlikowska, Rick W Keck, Omar A Khan, Ibrahim H Mostafa, Jerzy Jankun

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Katarzyna DettlaffDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 60‑780 Poznań, Poland.
Maciej StawnyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 60‑780 Poznań, Poland.
Magdalena OgrodowczykDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 60‑780 Poznań, Poland.
Anna JelińskaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 60‑780 Poznań, Poland.
Waldemar BednarskiInstitute of Molecular Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 60-179 Poznań, Poland.
Dorota Wątróbska-ŚwietlikowskaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-416 Gdańsk, Poland.
Rick W KeckUrology Research Center, Department of Urology, College of Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43614, USA.
Omar A KhanUrology Research Center, Department of Urology, College of Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43614, USA.
Ibrahim H MostafaUrology Research Center, Department of Urology, College of Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43614, USA.
Jerzy JankunUrology Research Center, Department of Urology, College of Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43614, USA.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PLUniversity of Toledo · USGdańsk Medical University · PLInstitute of Molecular Physics · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the United States, the annual incidence of bladder cancer is approximately 70,000 new cases, with a mortality rate of approximately 15,000/year. The most common subtype (70%) of bladder cancer is superficial, namely hte non-muscle invasive disease form limited to the urothelium. The rate of progression and recurrence is up to 40 and 70%, respectively. Urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder is typically treated with transurethral resection. The cancerous cells can float onto the adjacent epithelium, increasing the risk of recurrence. The standard of care is to offer adjuvant intravesical agents to reduce the risk of progression and recurrence. Current intravesical treatments are costly and are associated with special biohazard handling protocols. Patients are treated with intravesical therapy with bacillus Calmetter‑Guerin (BCG) bacterium, or mitomycin C (MMC) following resection, both of which can cause moderate to severe side-effects which are rarely life-threatening. We previously examined the efficacy of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) in comparison with MMC to prevent tumor cell implantation/growth in an animal model of superficial bladder cancer. Experiments revile that EGCG is slightly more effective than MMC at decreasing tumor cell implantation and consequent cancer growth in a bladder. This treatment requires the stringent sterile requirement of EGCG. EGCG can be unstable when sterilized at high temperatures. Thus, we evaluated two low temperature sterilization methods, such as ionizing radiation or the filtration method followed by freeze-drying. Both methods ensure the sterility of the sample; however, infrared and HPLC analysis revealed a slightly better stability of irradiated EGCG over the filtration method. The concentration of stable free radicals following irradiation was low, which are unlikely to exert any damaging effects to EGCG. Therefore, we consider that radiation will be the preferred method of EGCG sterilization, and that this may prove useful for the effective use of EGCG in the treatment of bladder cancer.

Indexed as

Anticarcinogenic AgentsCatechinChromatography, High Pressure LiquidCold TemperatureFiltrationFreeze DryingHumansRadiation, IonizingSterilizationUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAnticarcinogenic AgentsCatechinepigallocatechin gallate

Identifiers

PMID28627636
PMCPMC5504970
OpenAlexW2625061516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.