ArticleMolecular bioSystems2017
Dissecting binding of a β-barrel membrane protein by phage display.
Article in Molecular bioSystems, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improvements in the production of purified M13 bacteriophage bio-nanoparticle.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Membrane proteins (MPs) constitute a third of all proteomes, and contribute to a myriad of cellular functions including intercellular communication, nutrient transport and energy generation. For example, TonB-dependent transporters (TBDTs) in the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria play an essential role transporting iron and other nutrients into the bacterial cell. The inherently hydrophobic surfaces of MPs complicates protein expression, purification, and characterization. Thus, dissecting the functional contributions of individual amino acids or structural features through mutagenesis can be a challenging ordeal. Here, we apply a new approach for the expedited protein characterization of the TBDT ShuA from Shigella dysenteriae, and elucidate the protein's initial steps during heme-uptake. ShuA variants were displayed on the surface of an M13 bacteriophage as fusions to the P8 coat protein. Each ShuA variant was analyzed for its ability to display on the bacteriophage surface, and functionally bind to hemoglobin. This technique streamlines isolation of stable MP variants for rapid characterization of binding to various ligands. Site-directed mutagenesis studies targeting each extracellular loop region of ShuA demonstrate no specific extracellular loop is required for hemoglobin binding. Instead two residues, His420 and His86 mediate this interaction. The results identify a loop susceptible to antibody binding, and also a small molecule motif capable of disrupting ShuA from S. dysenteriae. The approach is generalizable to the dissection of other phage-displayed TBDTs and MPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.