Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28627370›Full record

ReviewPharmacological research2018

Chasing c-Kit through the heart: Taking a broader view.

Natalie A Gude, Mark A Sussman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacological research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Heart-derived endogenous stem cells.Molecular biology reports · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cardiac regenerative therapy: Many paths to repair.Trends in cardiovascular medicine · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Human CardioChimeras: Creation of a Novel "Next-Generation" Cardiac Cell.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Role of c-Kit in Myocardial Regeneration and Aging.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Cardiac progenitor cells: old is not always gold.The Journal of physiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Natalie A GudeSDSU Heart Institute, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182, USA. Electronic address: ngude@mail.sdsu.edu.
Mark A SussmanSDSU Heart Institute, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182, USA. Electronic address: heartman4ever@icloud.com.

Funding

Research Education CoreU54CA132384 · NCI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CRIPPS, RICHARD MATTHEW, CROWE, SHEILA E. · 2008 to 2022
$20.7M
Surgery, Physiology and ImmunohistopathologyP01HL085577 · NHLBI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GLEMBOTSKI, CHRIS · 2006 to 2017
$18.4M
Research Education CoreU54CA132379 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ARREDONDO, ELVA M, CROWE, SHEILA E. · 2008 to 2021
$16.1M
Regulation of Signal Transduction to Treat Heart FailureR01HL067245 · NHLBI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SUSSMAN, MARK ALAN · 2001 to 2021
$6.0M
Stem Cell Signaling in the Pathologically Challenged MyocardiumR37HL091102 · NHLBI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SUSSMAN, MARK ALAN · 2008 to 2017
$3.8M
Beta-adrenergic signaling: double edged sword of myocardial repairR01HL117163 · NHLBI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SUSSMAN, MARK ALAN · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
Antagonism of myocardial aging and senescence with Pim-1 kinaseR01HL105759 · NHLBI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SUSSMAN, MARK ALAN · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
Resolving myocardial regeneration by tracking commitment of c-Kit+ cellsR01HL135661 · NHLBI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GUDE, NATALIE ALLEN, SUSSMAN, MARK ALAN · 2017 to 2020
$1.7M
Enhanced Myocardial Repair with CardioClusters and CardioChimerasR01HL122525 · NHLBI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SUSSMAN, MARK ALAN · 2014 to 2017
$1.5M
Cardioprotection by optimizing mTOR activityR01HL113647 · NHLBI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SUSSMAN, MARK ALAN · 2013 to 2016
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA132379NCI NIH HHS U54 CA132384NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL085577NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL067245NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL105759NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL113647NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL117163NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL122525NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL135661NHLBI NIH HHS R37 HL091102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem cell mediated cardiac repair is an exciting and controversial area of cardiovascular research that holds the potential to produce novel, revolutionary therapies for the treatment of heart disease. Extensive investigation to define cell types contributing to cardiac formation, homeostasis and regeneration has produced several candidates, including adult cardiac c-Kit+ expressing stem and progenitor cells that have even been employed in a Phase I clinical trial demonstrating safety and feasibility of this therapeutic approach. However, the field of cardiac cell based therapy remains deeply divided due to strong disagreement among researchers and clinicians over which cell types, if any, are the best candidates for these applications. Research models that identify and define specific cardiac cells that effectively contribute to heart repair are urgently needed to resolve this debate. In this review, current c-Kit reporter models are discussed with respect to myocardial c-Kit cell biology and function, and future designs imagined to better represent endogenous myocardial c-Kit expression.

Indexed as

AnimalsHeartHumansProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitStem CellsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitCardiacc-KitKnock-inReporterTransgenic

Identifiers

PMID28627370
PMCPMC5729070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.