ArticleMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making2018
A Bayesian Simulation Model for Breast Cancer Screening, Incidence, Treatment, and Mortality.
Article in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving detection of colorectal cancer: A Bayesian approach to serial circulating tumour DNA testing following curative-intent treatment.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Article
- Cracking the code: Pioneering early detection and management of breast cancer in the Brazilian public healthcare system.Dialogues in health · 2025Review
- Mathematical Modeling to Address Questions in Breast Cancer Screening: An Overview of the Breast Cancer Models of the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network.Journal of breast imaging · 2025Review
- Mammographic screening: hero or villain.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Motivation Research on the Content Creation Behaviour of Young Adults in Anxiety Disorder Online Communities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Using Risk Stratification to Optimize Mammography Screening in Chinese Women.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2021Article
- Reflecting on 20 years of breast cancer modeling in CISNET: Recommendations for future cancer systems modeling efforts.PLoS computational biology · 2021Review
- Simulation Modeling of Cancer Clinical Trials: Application to Omitting Radiotherapy in Low-risk Breast Cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2018Article
- Geographical Variation in Oral and Oropharynx Cancer Mortality in Brazil: A Bayesian Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
- Introduction to the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) Breast Cancer Models.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe important but complicated research questions regarding the optimization of mammography screening for the detection of breast cancer are unable to be answered through any single trial or a simple meta-analysis of related trials. The Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Network (CISNET) breast groups provide answers using complex statistical models to simulate population dynamics. Among them, the MD Anderson Cancer Center (Model M) takes a unique approach by not making any assumptions on the natural history of breast cancer, such as the distribution of the indolent time before detection, but simulating only the observable part of a woman's disease and life.
methodsThe simulations start with 4 million women in the age distribution found in the year 1975, and follow them over several years. Input parameters are used to describe their breast cancer incidence rates, treatment efficacy, and survival. With these parameters, each woman's history of breast cancer diagnosis, treatment, and survival are generated and recorded each year. Research questions can then be answered by comparing the outcomes of interest, such as mortality rates, quality-adjusted life years, number of false positives, differences between hypothetical scenarios, such as different combinations of screening and treatment strategies. We use our model to estimate the relative contributions of screening and treatments on the mortality reduction in the United States, for both overall and different molecular (ER, HER2) subtypes of breast cancer.
resultsWe estimate and compare the benefits (life-years gained) and harm (false-positives, over-diagnoses) of mammography screening strategies with different frequencies (annual, biennial, triennial, mixed) and different starting (40 and 50 years) and end ages (70 and 80 years).
conclusionsWe will extend our model in future studies to account for local, regional, and distant disease recurrences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.