Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28627297›Full record

ArticleMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making2018

A Bayesian Simulation Model for Breast Cancer Screening, Incidence, Treatment, and Mortality.

Xuelin Huang, Yisheng Li, Juhee Song, Donald A Berry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Mammographic screening: hero or villain.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Motivation Research on the Content Creation Behaviour of Young Adults in Anxiety Disorder Online Communities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Geographical Variation in Oral and Oropharynx Cancer Mortality in Brazil: A Bayesian Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  12. Introduction to the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) Breast Cancer Models.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xuelin HuangDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Yisheng LiDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Juhee SongDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Donald A BerryDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)UL1TR000371 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2012 to 2016
$13.4M
Comparative Modeling: Informing Breast Cancer Control Practice and PolicyU01CA199218 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI BERRY, DONALD A, DE KONING, HARRY J · 2015 to 2019
$9.0M
Comparative Modeling: Informing Breast Cancer Control Practice & PolicyU01CA152958 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI BERRY, DONALD A, DE KONING, HARRY J · 2010 to 2015
$7.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000371NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152958NCI NIH HHS U01 CA199218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe important but complicated research questions regarding the optimization of mammography screening for the detection of breast cancer are unable to be answered through any single trial or a simple meta-analysis of related trials. The Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Network (CISNET) breast groups provide answers using complex statistical models to simulate population dynamics. Among them, the MD Anderson Cancer Center (Model M) takes a unique approach by not making any assumptions on the natural history of breast cancer, such as the distribution of the indolent time before detection, but simulating only the observable part of a woman's disease and life.

methodsThe simulations start with 4 million women in the age distribution found in the year 1975, and follow them over several years. Input parameters are used to describe their breast cancer incidence rates, treatment efficacy, and survival. With these parameters, each woman's history of breast cancer diagnosis, treatment, and survival are generated and recorded each year. Research questions can then be answered by comparing the outcomes of interest, such as mortality rates, quality-adjusted life years, number of false positives, differences between hypothetical scenarios, such as different combinations of screening and treatment strategies. We use our model to estimate the relative contributions of screening and treatments on the mortality reduction in the United States, for both overall and different molecular (ER, HER2) subtypes of breast cancer.

resultsWe estimate and compare the benefits (life-years gained) and harm (false-positives, over-diagnoses) of mammography screening strategies with different frequencies (annual, biennial, triennial, mixed) and different starting (40 and 50 years) and end ages (70 and 80 years).

conclusionsWe will extend our model in future studies to account for local, regional, and distant disease recurrences.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremBreast NeoplasmsCancer Care FacilitiesChemotherapy, AdjuvantComputer SimulationFemaleGenes, erbB-2HumansMammographyMedical OveruseReceptors, EstrogenRisk AssessmentSurvival AnalysisTexasTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesReceptors, Estrogenadjuvant treatmentsapproximate Bayesian computationBayesian simulationbeyond stage-shiftbreast cancercancer screeningmammography

Identifiers

PMID28627297
PMCPMC5711634
OpenAlexW2673215368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.