Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28627231›Full record

ArticleClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis2018

A Novel Risk Scoring System to Predict Cardiovascular Death in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: CHA

Harun Kundi, Emrullah Kiziltunc, Ahmet Korkmaz, Gokhan Cicek, Ender Ornek, Mehmet Ileri

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CHAThe Journal of international medical research · 2019
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Harun Kundi1 Cardiology Department, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Emrullah Kiziltunc1 Cardiology Department, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Ahmet Korkmaz1 Cardiology Department, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Gokhan Cicek1 Cardiology Department, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Ender Ornek1 Cardiology Department, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Mehmet Ileri1 Cardiology Department, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aimed to determine the long-term prognostic validity of the CHA

Indexed as

AgedCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificityST Elevation Myocardial Infarctionacute myocardial infarctionCHA2DS2-VAScCHA2DS2-VASc-CFrisk score

Identifiers

PMID28627231
PMCPMC6714684
OpenAlexW2653904311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.