Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28627123›Full record

Trial reportJournal of veterinary internal medicine2017

Pharmacokinetics and Relative Bioavailability of Orally Administered Innovator-Formulated Itraconazole Capsules and Solution in Healthy Dogs.

A E Hasbach, D K Langlois, E J Rosser, M G Papich

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A case ofMedical mycology case reports · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Antiviral Activity of Itraconazole against Echovirus 30 InfectionOsong public health and research perspectives · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A E HasbachDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
D K LangloisDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7726-6307
E J RosserDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
M G PapichMolecular Biomedical Sciences Department, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7591-7898
Michigan State University · USNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundItraconazole is commonly used for treatment of systemic and cutaneous mycoses in veterinary medicine. Two formulations, capsule and solution, are used interchangeably in dogs. However, marked differences in bioavailability have been reported in other species. Similar investigations have not been performed in dogs.

objectiveTo determine and compare pharmacokinetics of itraconazole in dogs after oral administration of commercially available capsule and solution formulations intended for use in humans. ANIMALS: Eight healthy, adult, purpose-bred dogs.

methodsDogs received approximately 10 mg/kg of innovator-formulated itraconazole solution and capsule PO in randomized, crossover design with a 10-day washout period. To ensure maximal absorption, solution was administered to fasted dogs, whereas capsules were co-administered with food. Blood samples were collected at predetermined time points, and plasma drug concentrations were measured using high-pressure liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined with compartmental analysis.

resultsThe mean relative bioavailability of the capsule was 85% that of the solution, but drug absorption was variable, and overall drug concentrations were similar between formulations. Mean elimination half-lives of both formulations were nearly identical at approximately 33 hours. Regardless of formulation, simulations suggest that a loading dose of 20 mg/kg, followed by 10 mg/kg once every 24 hours, will result in plasma concentrations considered to be adequate in most dogs. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Contrary to findings reported in other species, overall drug exposures after capsule and solution administration are not substantially different in dogs. Despite some pharmacokinetic differences between itraconazole capsule and solution, formulation-specific dosages do not appear to be necessary.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimalsAntifungal AgentsCapsulesCross-Over StudiesDogsFemaleItraconazoleMaleSolutionsAntifungal AgentsCapsulesItraconazoleSolutionsBlastomycosisHistoplasmosisMycologySporanox®

Identifiers

PMID28627123
PMCPMC5508362
OpenAlexW2688558478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.