Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28626983›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2017

Comparison of systemic pharmacodynamic effects of two combination pressurized metered dose inhalers that deliver salmeterol and fluticasone propionate.

Lester I Harrison, Victoria Sessions, Christopher J Wiggenhorn, David Chalmers, Pui Leung, John Efthimiou

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyEquivalence TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02232087 (Phase I Single Blind, Randomised, Cross-over Pharmacodynamic Dose Response Study in Healthy Volunteers of Two Pressurized Metered Dose Inhalers), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02232087 phase1completednot on this map

Phase I Single Blind, Randomised, Cross-over Pharmacodynamic Dose Response Study in Healthy Volunteers of Two Pressurized Metered Dose Inhalers (pMDIs) That Deliver Salmeterol and Fluticasone Propionate

TypeinterventionalSponsorKindeva Drug DeliveryRan2014 to 2014Enrolled52ConditionsHealthyArmsSalmeterol, fluticasone propionate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lester I HarrisonClinical and Biostatistics, Drug Delivery Systems Division, 3M Center, St Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5040-5095
Victoria SessionsClinical Programme Management, 3M Health Care Ltd, Loughborough, Leicestershire, UK.
Christopher J WiggenhornClinical and Biostatistics, Drug Delivery Systems Division, 3M Center, St Paul, Minnesota, USA.
David ChalmersData Sciences, Quotient Clinical, Edinburgh, UK.
Pui LeungClinical Research, Quotient Clinical Ltd, Ruddington, Nottingham, UK.
John EfthimiouIndependent Respiratory Consultancy, 5 Carey Close, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this study was to test the systemic pharmacodynamic effects of the salmeterol component of two pressurized metered dose inhalers that delivered a combination of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate (SM/FP).

methodsThis was a six-way crossover study in 43 adult subjects, using a single blind design (subject blinded to product and clinical assessor blinded for all measurements). Each subject received single doses of two, six, and twelve inhalations from test and reference products that delivered SM/FP as 25/125 mcg per inhalation. Heart rate, QTcB, and plasma potassium and glucose were monitored over 6 h.

resultsSafety equivalence was shown by relative potency analysis for primary endpoints of maximum heart rate and maximum QTcB, since the 90% confidence intervals for both endpoints were within the acceptance limit of (0.67, 1.50). There were six secondary analyses for relative potency and equivalence was met for five of these endpoints. There were also 18 pairwise comparisons performed at each dose level. No statistical differences (95% confidence intervals included zero) among these pairwise comparisons were seen at the two-inhalation dose (therapeutic dose) or the six-inhalation dose. At the supratherapeutic dose of twelve inhalations, the test product was either comparable to or statistically less than that of the reference product for all comparisons. Overall, the results demonstrated comparable systemic safety. No differences were seen between the products in reported adverse events.

conclusionThe safety equivalence of the systemic pharmacodynamic effects of the SM component of the test and reference SM/FP products was demonstrated.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdolescentAdultArea Under CurveAsthmaBronchodilator AgentsCross-Over StudiesElectrocardiographyFemaleFluticasone-Salmeterol Drug CombinationHealthy VolunteersHeart RateHumansMaleMetered Dose InhalersMiddle AgedBronchodilator AgentsFluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combinationfluticasone propionatehealthy subjectsinhalerpharmacodynamicssalmeterol

Identifiers

PMID28626983
PMCPMC5651317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.