ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2017
Investigating the Relationship between Morning Glycemic Variability and Patient Characteristics Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk factors for hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of morning basal + 1 bolus insulin therapy (insulin glulisine + insulin glargine 300 U/mL vs insulin lispro + insulin glargine biosimilar) using continuous glucose monitoring: A randomized crossover study.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2018Trial
- Predicting hypoglycemia in elderly inpatients with type 2 diabetes: the ADOCHBIU model.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Assessing hypoglycemia frequency using flash glucose monitoring in older Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes receiving oral hypoglycemic agents.Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective To investigate the relationship between patient characteristics and morning glycemic variability. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 106 patients with type 2 diabetes who underwent continuous glucose monitoring during admission. The highest postprandial glucose level (within 3 hours after breakfast; 'highest level'), the time from the start of breakfast to the highest postprandial glucose level ('highest time'), the difference between the pre-breakfast and highest postprandial breakfast glucose level ('increase'), the area under the curve (AUC; ≥180 mg/dL) for the glycemic variability within 3 hours after breakfast ('morning AUC'), and the post-breakfast glucose gradient ('gradient') were calculated. We analyzed the associations between these factors and nocturnal hypoglycemia and the patients' characteristics by using a regression analysis. Results After stepwise multivariate adjustment, significant independent associations were found between 'highest level' and high age, low BMI, and high HbA1c; 'highest time' and high HbA1c, low C-peptide immunoreactivity (CPR), and low fasting plasma glucose (FPG); the 'increase' and high age, low BMI, high HbA1c, low FPG and hypoglycemia; 'morning AUC' and high age, high HbA1c and hypoglycemia; and 'gradient' and long duration of diabetes and low BMI. Conclusion Higher age and lower BMI are associated with higher 'highest' and 'increase' levels. Higher HbA1c levels were linked to a longer 'highest time', and longer durations of the diabetes, while lower BMI values were related to a higher 'gradient'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.