Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28626075›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology2017

Sex differences in vascular physiology and pathophysiology: estrogen and androgen signaling in health and disease.

Austin C Boese, Seong C Kim, Ke-Jie Yin, Jean-Pyo Lee, Milton H Hamblin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04419727 (Molecular Analysis of Estrogen Receptors in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 107 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04419727 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Molecular Analysis of Estrogen Receptors in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of CatanzaroRan2020 to 2020Enrolled40ConditionsEstrogen Deficiency, Peripheral Artery DiseaseArmsarterial reconstructive open surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Sex differences in endothelial function in chronic kidney disease.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2020
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Toward Sex-Specific Biomaterials Innovation: A Perspective.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025
    Review

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Austin C BoeseDepartment of Pharmacology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Seong C KimDepartment of Pharmacology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Ke-Jie YinDepartment of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Jean-Pyo LeeDepartment of Neurology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana; and.
Milton H HamblinDepartment of Pharmacology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana; mhambli@tulane.edu.

Funding

Tulane Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health (BIRCWH)K12HD043451 · NICHD · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI KROUSEL-WOOD, MARIE · 2002 to 2023
$9.9M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD043451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex differences between women and men are often overlooked and underappreciated when studying the cardiovascular system. It has been long assumed that men and women are physiologically similar, and this notion has resulted in women being clinically evaluated and treated for cardiovascular pathophysiological complications as men. Currently, there is increased recognition of fundamental sex differences in cardiovascular function, anatomy, cell signaling, and pathophysiology. The National Institutes of Health have enacted guidelines expressly to gain knowledge about ways the sexes differ in both normal function and diseases at the various research levels (molecular, cellular, tissue, and organ system). Greater understanding of these sex differences will be used to steer future directions in the biomedical sciences and translational and clinical research. This review describes sex-based differences in the physiology and pathophysiology of the vasculature, with a special emphasis on sex steroid receptor (estrogen and androgen receptor) signaling and their potential impact on vascular function in health and diseases (e.g., atherosclerosis, hypertension, peripheral artery disease, abdominal aortic aneurysms, cerebral aneurysms, and stroke).

Indexed as

AndrogensAnimalsCardiovascular DiseasesCardiovascular SystemEstrogensFemaleGonadal Steroid HormonesHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Status DisparitiesHumansMaleReceptors, AndrogenReceptors, EstrogenSex FactorsSignal TransductionAndrogensEstrogensGonadal Steroid HormonesReceptors, AndrogenReceptors, Estrogenandrogen receptorscardiovascular systemestrogen receptorssex differencessex steroid hormones

Identifiers

PMID28626075
PMCPMC5625178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.