ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2017
Predicting biomedical metadata in CEDAR: A study of Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO).
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- How far are we from the era of big data in transcriptomics? Lessons from the bacterial data in GEO.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- The Effect of Vitamin D Deficiency on Immune-Related Hub Genes: A Network Analysis Associated With Type 1 Diabetes.Cureus · 2024Article
- Unraveling the roles ofFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024Article
- Systematic tissue annotations of genomics samples by modeling unstructured metadata.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Maximizing the reusability of gene expression data by predicting missing metadata.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Applying citizen science to gene, drug and disease relationship extraction from biomedical abstracts.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Mining data and metadata from the gene expression omnibus.Biophysical reviews · 2019Review
- Restructured GEO: restructuring Gene Expression Omnibus metadata for genome dynamics analysis.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019Article
- Fast and Accurate Metadata Authoring Using Ontology-Based Recommendations.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A crucial and limiting factor in data reuse is the lack of accurate, structured, and complete descriptions of data, known as metadata. Towards improving the quantity and quality of metadata, we propose a novel metadata prediction framework to learn associations from existing metadata that can be used to predict metadata values. We evaluate our framework in the context of experimental metadata from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). We applied four rule mining algorithms to the most common structured metadata elements (sample type, molecular type, platform, label type and organism) from over 1.3million GEO records. We examined the quality of well supported rules from each algorithm and visualized the dependencies among metadata elements. Finally, we evaluated the performance of the algorithms in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F-measure. We found that PART is the best algorithm outperforming Apriori, Predictive Apriori, and Decision Table. All algorithms perform significantly better in predicting class values than the majority vote classifier. We found that the performance of the algorithms is related to the dimensionality of the GEO elements. The average performance of all algorithm increases due of the decreasing of dimensionality of the unique values of these elements (2697 platforms, 537 organisms, 454 labels, 9 molecules, and 5 types). Our work suggests that experimental metadata such as present in GEO can be accurately predicted using rule mining algorithms. Our work has implications for both prospective and retrospective augmentation of metadata quality, which are geared towards making data easier to find and reuse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.