Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28625880›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2017

Predicting biomedical metadata in CEDAR: A study of Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO).

Maryam Panahiazar, Michel Dumontier, Olivier Gevaert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Unraveling the roles ofFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Restructured GEO: restructuring Gene Expression Omnibus metadata for genome dynamics analysis.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019
    Article
  9. Fast and Accurate Metadata Authoring Using Ontology-Based Recommendations.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maryam PanahiazarStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Center for Data Annotation and Retrieval, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, 94305, United States.
Michel DumontierStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Center for Data Annotation and Retrieval, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, 94305, United States.
Olivier GevaertStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Center for Data Annotation and Retrieval, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, 94305, United States. Electronic address: olivier.gevaert@stanford.edu.

Funding

TrainingU54AI117925 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MUSEN, MARK A · 2014 to 2018
$12.9M
Identification of Cooperative Genetic Alterations in the Pathogenesis of Oral CancerU01DE025188 · NIDCR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GEVAERT, OLIVIER, KUO, CALVIN J · 2015 to 2018
$3.8M
Radiogenomics Framework for Non-Invasive Personalized MedicineR01EB020527 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GEVAERT, OLIVIER · 2015 to 2018
$2.3M
NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI117925NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020527NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE025188
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A crucial and limiting factor in data reuse is the lack of accurate, structured, and complete descriptions of data, known as metadata. Towards improving the quantity and quality of metadata, we propose a novel metadata prediction framework to learn associations from existing metadata that can be used to predict metadata values. We evaluate our framework in the context of experimental metadata from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). We applied four rule mining algorithms to the most common structured metadata elements (sample type, molecular type, platform, label type and organism) from over 1.3million GEO records. We examined the quality of well supported rules from each algorithm and visualized the dependencies among metadata elements. Finally, we evaluated the performance of the algorithms in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F-measure. We found that PART is the best algorithm outperforming Apriori, Predictive Apriori, and Decision Table. All algorithms perform significantly better in predicting class values than the majority vote classifier. We found that the performance of the algorithms is related to the dimensionality of the GEO elements. The average performance of all algorithm increases due of the decreasing of dimensionality of the unique values of these elements (2697 platforms, 537 organisms, 454 labels, 9 molecules, and 5 types). Our work suggests that experimental metadata such as present in GEO can be accurately predicted using rule mining algorithms. Our work has implications for both prospective and retrospective augmentation of metadata quality, which are geared towards making data easier to find and reuse.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDatabases, GeneticGene ExpressionMetadataHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesCEDARData miningGEOMetadataPrediction

Identifiers

PMID28625880
PMCPMC5643580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.