Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28625003›Full record

ReviewAdvances in therapy2017

When Science is Not Enough: A Framework Towards More Customer-Focused Drug Development.

Nektarios Oraiopoulos, William C N Dunlop

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nektarios OraiopoulosCambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
William C N DunlopMundipharma International, Cambridge, UK. will.dunlop@mundipharma.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe purpose of this study was to identify the key barriers to a customer-focused drug development process and develop a comprehensive framework to overcome them.

methodsThe paper draws on existing literature, both academic and practitioner, across a range of disciplines (innovation management, marketing, organizational behavior, behavioral economics, health economics, industry reports). On the basis of this extensive review, a conceptual framework is developed that offers concrete suggestions on how organizations can overcome the barriers and enable a more customer-focused development process.

resultsThe barriers to collaboration are organized into three distinct categories (economic, behavioral, organizational), and within each category, a one-to-one mapping between barriers and solutions is developed.

conclusionThe framework is specifically designed with the objective of offering actionable and practical advice to executives who face these challenges in their organizations. The paper provides a unique theoretical contribution by synthesizing findings from several academic disciplines with concrete examples from the pharmaceutical industry.

fundingMundipharma International Limited.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationPrescription DrugsCooperative BehaviorDrug DiscoveryDrug IndustryHumansPrescription DrugsBusinessCustomer-focused developmentDrug developmentFinanceHealth economicsMarket accessPatient accessPharmaceuticalsR&D managementValue frameworks

Identifiers

PMID28625003
PMCPMC5504205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.