Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28624938›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2017

Synergetic integration of laccase and versatile peroxidase with magnetic silica microspheres towards remediation of biorefinery wastewater.

Dhanya Vishnu, Gerard Neeraj, Ramachandran Swaroopini, Ravi Shobana, Vaidyanathan Vinoth Kumar, Hubert Cabana

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Integration ofIET nanobiotechnology · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dhanya VishnuDepartment of Biotechnology, Bioprocess Engineering Laboratory, School of Bioengineering, SRM University, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu, 603 203, India.
Gerard NeerajDepartment of Biotechnology, Bioprocess Engineering Laboratory, School of Bioengineering, SRM University, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu, 603 203, India.
Ramachandran SwaroopiniDepartment of Biotechnology, Bioprocess Engineering Laboratory, School of Bioengineering, SRM University, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu, 603 203, India.
Ravi ShobanaDepartment of Biotechnology, Bioprocess Engineering Laboratory, School of Bioengineering, SRM University, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu, 603 203, India.
Vaidyanathan Vinoth KumarDepartment of Biotechnology, Bioprocess Engineering Laboratory, School of Bioengineering, SRM University, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu, 603 203, India. vinothkumar.v@ktr.srmuniv.ac.in.
Hubert CabanaEnvironmental Engineering Laboratory, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Sherbrooke University, Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1K 2R1, Canada. Hubert.Cabana@USherbrooke.ca.
SRM Institute of Science and Technology · INSRM University · INUniversité de Sherbrooke · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, a tailor-made biocatalyst consisting of a co-immobilized lignolytic enzyme cascade on multi-functionalized magnetic silica microspheres (MSMS) was developed. Physical adsorption was the most promising strategy for the synthesis of individual immobilized laccase (IL), immobilized versatile peroxidase (IP), as well as co-immobilized laccase (Lac) and versatile peroxidase (VP) with an enzyme activity recovery of about 79, 93, 27, and 27.5%, respectively. Similarly, the biocatalytic load of 116, 183, 23.6, and 31 U/g was obtained for IL, IP, and co-immobilized Lac and VP, respectively. The co-immobilized enzyme system exhibited better pH stability than the free and individual immobilized system by retaining more than 100% residual activity at pH 7.0 after a 150-h incubation; whereas, the thermal stability and kinetics of the co-immobilized biocatalyst were not much improved. IL and IP could be recycled for 10 cycles after which they retained 31 and 44% of their initial activities. Co-immobilized Lac and VP were reused for ten consecutive cycles at the end of which Lac activity was depleted, and 37% of VP activity was left. Free enzymes, IL, IP, co-immobilized Lac, and VP were applied to biorefinery wastewater (BRW) in a batch study to investigate the transformation of phenolic contaminants over a period of 5 days. The major classes of phenolic constituents in terms of their order of removal in a Lac-VP system was phenol >2-chlorophenol > trichlorophenol > dichlorophenol > cresols > dimethylphenol >2 methyl- 4, 6-dinitrophenol > 4-nitrophenol > tetrachlorophenols > pentachlorophenol. The free enzymes and individually immobilized enzymes resulted in 80% dephenolization in 5 days. By contrast, the co-immobilized biocatalyst provided rapid dephenolization yielding the same 80% removal within 24 h and 96% removal of phenols in 60 h after which the system stabilized, which is the major advantage of the co-immobilized biocatalyst. ᅟ Graphical abstract.

Indexed as

MicrospheresBiocatalysisBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBioreactorsEnzymes, ImmobilizedLaccaseMagnetic FieldsPeroxidaseSilicon DioxideWaste Disposal, FluidWastewaterEnzymes, ImmobilizedLaccasePeroxidaseSilicon DioxideWastewaterBiocatalysisBiorefinery wastewaterCo-immobilizationLignolytic enzymesMagnetic silica

Identifiers

PMID28624938
OpenAlexW2626336700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.