ArticleBrain imaging and behavior2019
Discriminative self-representation sparse regression for neuroimaging-based alzheimer's disease diagnosis.
Article in Brain imaging and behavior, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning studies on major brain diseases: 5-year trends of 2014-2018.Japanese journal of radiology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a novel feature selection method by jointly considering (1) 'task-specific' relations between response variables (e.g., clinical labels in this work) and neuroimaging features and (2) 'self-representation' relations among neuroimaging features in a sparse regression framework. Specifically, the task-specific relation is devised to learn the relative importance of features for representation of response variables by a linear combination of the input features in a supervised manner, while the self-representation relation is used to take into account the inherent information among neuroimaging features such that any feature can be represented by a weighted sum of the other features, regardless of the label information, in an unsupervised manner. By integrating these two different relations along with a group sparsity constraint, we formulate a new sparse linear regression model for class-discriminative feature selection. The selected features are used to train a support vector machine for classification. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed method, we conducted experiments on the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset; experimental results showed superiority of the proposed method over the state-of-the-art methods considered in this work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.