Trial reportInternational ophthalmology2018
Comparison of autologous fibrin glue versus nylon sutures for securing conjunctival autografting in pterygium surgery.
Trial report in International ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy of combined bandage contact lens and nasal margin suture fixation in pterygium patients and its impact on inflammatory cytokines.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Autologous fibrin glue versus sutures for conjunctival autograft in primary pterygium: a randomized clinical trial.International ophthalmology · 2023Trial
- In Vitro Evaluation of a Semi-Autologous Fibrin Sealant for Surgical Applications.Macromolecular bioscience · 2025Article
- Use of Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane During Pterygium Excision: Health Economic Analysis.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- Effect of Pterygium Removal Combined with Conjunctival Autograft on Corneal Parameters in Swept-Source Imaging.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the safety, operating time, postoperative ocular signs, symptoms, overall patient satisfaction, complications rate and recurrence rate of autologous fibrin glue (AFG) and nylon suturing (NS) for attaching conjunctival autografts in pterygium surgery.
methodsA prospective, randomized, interventional study was performed among 120 patients (120 eyes) with primary pterygium. Superior conjunctival autograft was harvested and transferred on to bare sclera after pterygium excision. For attaching the autograft, AFG (n = 60 eyes) and NS (n = 60 eyes) were used. The patients were followed up for 12 months. The groups were compared for the safety, operative time, postoperative ocular signs, symptoms, overall patient satisfaction, recurrence and complications rate.
resultsAll conjunctival autografts in both groups were successfully attached. The average operating time for the AFG group was significantly shorter (P < 0.001). Postoperative symptoms were fewer for the AFG group than the suture group. After 12 months of follow-up, no recurrence was reported for the AFG group, but 8.3% of patients experienced recurrence in the NS group.
conclusionsOur study demonstrated the superiority of AFG to NS in saving operating time and elimination of recurrence without any complications in pterygium surgery. AFG can obviate the need for suturing and increases the viability of tissue flaps. Additional studies are necessary to determine the long-term effects considering factors such as primary or recurrent status of pterygium, age and sex of patient, dose and duration of treatment for mitomycin C.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.