Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28624764›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2018

Recommended core items to assess e-cigarette use in population-based surveys.

Jennifer L Pearson, Sara C Hitchman, Leonie S Brose, Linda Bauld, Allison M Glasser, Andrea C Villanti, Ann McNeill, David B Abrams, Joanna E Cohen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Randomized Pilot of a Tailored Smoking Cessation Quitline Intervention for Individuals Who Smoke and Vape.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Trial
  3. Vapes, E-cigs, and Mods: What Do Young Adults Call E-cigarettes?Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Characteristics of Canadians who use vaping products, by smoking status: findings from the Canadian Community Health Survey, 2020.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Retrospective and Real-time Measures of the Quantity of E-cigarette Use: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Article
  13. Assessing Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Device Type Accurately in Surveys.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Predictors of Discontinued E-Cigarette Use at One-Year Follow-Up in a Sample of Young Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Use of Tobacco Industry Vaping Products in the UK and Product Characteristics: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jennifer L PearsonSchroeder Institute for Tobacco Research & Policy Studies at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, USA.
Sara C HitchmanDepartment of Addictions, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Leonie S BroseDepartment of Addictions, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Linda BauldUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, London, UK.
Allison M GlasserSchroeder Institute for Tobacco Research & Policy Studies at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, USA.
Andrea C VillantiSchroeder Institute for Tobacco Research & Policy Studies at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, USA.
Ann McNeillDepartment of Addictions, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
David B AbramsSchroeder Institute for Tobacco Research & Policy Studies at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, USA.
Joanna E CohenDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

EMA and Lab Assessment of Nicotine Dependence Among Dual End UsersK01DA037950 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI PEARSON, JENNIFER LYNN · 2014 to 2017
$611k
British Heart FoundationCancer Research UK 19748Cancer Research UK C52999/A19748Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/K023195/1NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA037950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A consistent approach using standardised items to assess e-cigarette use in both youth and adult populations will aid cross-survey and cross-national comparisons of the effect of e-cigarette (and tobacco) policies and improve our understanding of the population health impact of e-cigarette use. Focusing on adult behaviour, we propose a set of e-cigarette use items, discuss their utility and potential adaptation, and highlight e-cigarette constructs that researchers should avoid without further item development. Reliable and valid items will strengthen the emerging science and inform knowledge synthesis for policy-making. Building on informal discussions at a series of international meetings of 65 experts from 15 countries, the authors provide recommendations for assessing e-cigarette use behaviour, relative perceived harm, device type, presence of nicotine, flavours and reasons for use. We recommend items assessing eight core constructs: e-cigarette ever use, frequency of use and former daily use; relative perceived harm; device type; primary flavour preference; presence of nicotine; and primary reason for use. These items should be standardised or minimally adapted for the policy context and target population. Researchers should be prepared to update items as e-cigarette device characteristics change. A minimum set of e-cigarette items is proposed to encourage consensus around items to allow for cross-survey and cross-jurisdictional comparisons of e-cigarette use behaviour. These proposed items are a starting point. We recognise room for continued improvement, and welcome input from e-cigarette users and scientific colleagues.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsHumansSmokingSurveys and QuestionnairesTerminology as TopicElectronic nicotine delivery devicesPublic policySurveillance and monitoring

Identifiers

PMID28624764
PMCPMC6934252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.