ArticleNeuroImage2017
Cingulo-opercular activity affects incidental memory encoding for speech in noise.
Article in NeuroImage, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Engagement of the speech motor system in challenging speech perception: Activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses.Human brain mapping · 2024Pooled it
- Neurophysiological Functional Connectivity Changes during Difficult Listening in Older and Younger Adults.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Resting-State Functional Connectivity Between the Cingulo-Opercular and Default Mode Networks May Explain Socioeconomic Inequalities in Cognitive Development.Journal of cellular neuroscience · 2025Article
- The effect of noise on the cortical activity patterns of speech processing in adults with single-sided deafness.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Article
- Evidence for cortical adjustments to perceptual decision criteria during word recognition in noise.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- Unique patterns of hearing loss and cognition in older adults' neural responses to cues for speech recognition difficulty.Brain structure & function · 2022Article
- Sublexical cues affect degraded speech processing: insights from fMRI.Cerebral cortex communications · 2022Article
- Sentence predictability modulates cortical response to phonetic ambiguity.Brain and language · 2021Article
- Neural modelling of the semantic predictability gain under challenging listening conditions.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- Cingulo-opercular adaptive control for younger and older adults during a challenging gap detection task.Journal of neuroscience research · 2020Article
- The Impact of Age, Background Noise, Semantic Ambiguity, and Hearing Loss on Recognition Memory for Spoken Sentences.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2018Article
- Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Brain Networks in Schizophrenia during a Working Memory Task.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2017Article
- Listening Effort Is Not the Same as Speech Intelligibility Score.Trends in hearingArticle
- Article
- Listening Effort: How the Cognitive Consequences of Acoustic Challenge Are Reflected in Brain and Behavior.Ear and hearingReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Correctly understood speech in difficult listening conditions is often difficult to remember. A long-standing hypothesis for this observation is that the engagement of cognitive resources to aid speech understanding can limit resources available for memory encoding. This hypothesis is consistent with evidence that speech presented in difficult conditions typically elicits greater activity throughout cingulo-opercular regions of frontal cortex that are proposed to optimize task performance through adaptive control of behavior and tonic attention. However, successful memory encoding of items for delayed recognition memory tasks is consistently associated with increased cingulo-opercular activity when perceptual difficulty is minimized. The current study used a delayed recognition memory task to test competing predictions that memory encoding for words is enhanced or limited by the engagement of cingulo-opercular activity during challenging listening conditions. An fMRI experiment was conducted with twenty healthy adult participants who performed a word identification in noise task that was immediately followed by a delayed recognition memory task. Consistent with previous findings, word identification trials in the poorer signal-to-noise ratio condition were associated with increased cingulo-opercular activity and poorer recognition memory scores on average. However, cingulo-opercular activity decreased for correctly identified words in noise that were not recognized in the delayed memory test. These results suggest that memory encoding in difficult listening conditions is poorer when elevated cingulo-opercular activity is not sustained. Although increased attention to speech when presented in difficult conditions may detract from more active forms of memory maintenance (e.g., sub-vocal rehearsal), we conclude that task performance monitoring and/or elevated tonic attention supports incidental memory encoding in challenging listening conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.