ArticleJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2018
Statin Trials, Cardiovascular Events, and Coronary Artery Calcification: Implications for a Trial-Based Approach to Statin Therapy in MESA.
Article in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04977089 (Study of Lipid Profile of Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndromes at Sohag University Hospital), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Study of Lipid Profile of Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndromes at Sohag University Hospital
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preoperative statin therapy for adults undergoing cardiac surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Coronary Artery Calcification Under Statin Therapy and Its Effect on Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Statin prescription patterns among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.BMC endocrine disorders · 2026Article
- Coronary Plaque Vulnerability and Pericoronary Adipose Tissue Inflammation: Emerging Insights from Advanced CT Imaging.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Optimal Medical Therapy Targeting Lipids and Inflammation for Secondary Prevention in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- CT coronary angiography in the lipid clinic: a pilot study and lipidologist survey.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Age- and sex-based heterogeneity in coronary artery plaque presence and burden in familial hypercholesterolemia: A multi-national study.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2024Article
- The Complex Mechanisms and the Potential Effects of Statins on Vascular Calcification: A Narrative Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Imaging subclinical coronary atherosclerosis to guide lipid management, are we there yet?American journal of preventive cardiology · 2023Review
- Coronary artery calcium and cystatin C for risk stratification of MACCEs and all-cause death in symptomatic patients.Clinical cardiology · 2023Article
- 2023 Guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology on the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Coronary Syndrome.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2023Article
- Regulation of cholesterol homeostasis in health and diseases: from mechanisms to targeted therapeutics.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022Review
- Article
- Targeted proteomics improves cardiovascular risk prediction in secondary prevention.European heart journal · 2022Article
- Subclinical cardiovascular disease and utility of coronary artery calcium score.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2021Review
- The Role of Coronary Artery Calcium Testing for Value-Based Clinical Trials in Primary Prevention.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2021Review
- Is There a Role of Coronary CTA in Primary Prevention? Current State and Future Directions.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2021Review
- Article
- The Effects of Warfarin and Direct Oral Anticoagulants on Systemic Vascular Calcification: A Review.Cells · 2021Review
- Egyptian practical guidance in lipid management 2020.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study sought to determine whether coronary artery calcium (CAC) could be used to optimize statin allocation among individuals for whom trial-based evidence supports efficacy of statin therapy.
backgroundRecently, allocation of statins was proposed for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) based on proven efficacy from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of statin therapy, a so-called trial-based approach.
methodsThe study used data from MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) with 5,600 men and women, 45 to 84 years of age, and free of clinical ASCVD, lipid-lowering therapy, or missing information for risk factors at baseline examination.
resultsDuring 10 years' follow-up, 354 ASCVD and 219 hard coronary heart disease (CHD) events occurred. Based on enrollment criteria for 7 RCTs of statin therapy in primary prevention, 73% of MESA participants (91% of those >55 years of age) were eligible for statin therapy according to a trial-based approach. Among those individuals, CAC = 0 was common (44%) and was associated with low rates of ASCVD and CHD (3.9 and 1.7, respectively, per 1,000 person-years). There was a graded increase in event rates with increasing CAC score, and in individuals with CAC >100 (27% of participants) the rates of ASCVD and CHD were 18.9 and 12.7, respectively. Consequently, the estimated number needed to treat (NNT) in 10 years to prevent 1 event varied greatly according to CAC score. For ASCVD events, the NNT was 87 for CAC = 0 and 19 for CAC >100. For CHD events, the NNT was 197 for CAC = 0 and 28 for CAC >100.
conclusionsMost MESA participants qualified for trial-based primary prevention with statins. Among the individuals for whom trial-based evidence supports efficacy of statin therapy, CAC = 0 and CAC >100 were common and associated with low and high cardiovascular risks, respectively. This information may guide shared decision making aimed at targeting evidence-based statins to those who are likely to benefit the most.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.