Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28624340›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry

Effects of Teriparatide, Denosumab, or Both on Spine Trabecular Microarchitecture in DATA-Switch: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Joy N Tsai, Linda A Jiang, Hang Lee, Didier Hans, Benjamin Z Leder

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Impact of standard versus cyclic teriparatide and denosumab treatment on trabecular bone score: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Trial
  5. Romosozumab improves microarchitecture as assessed by tissue thickness-adjusted trabecular bone score in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Denosumab After Teriparatide in Premenopausal Women With Idiopathic Osteoporosis.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2022
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. A Review on the Role of Denosumab in Fracture Prevention.Drug design, development and therapy · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joy N TsaiEndocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: jntsai@mgh.harvard.edu.
Linda A JiangEndocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Hang LeeBiostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Didier HansCenter of Bone Disease, Bone and Joint Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Benjamin Z LederEndocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001102 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2013 to 2017
$106.2M
Novel combination therapies in the treatment of osteoporosisK24AR067847 · NIAMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI LEDER, BENJAMIN Z · 2015 to 2019
$926k
Effect of Anabolic and Antiresorptive Therapy on Bone Quality in OsteoporosisK23AR068447 · NIAMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI TSAI, JOY · 2015 to 2019
$818k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001102NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR068447NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR067847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In postmenopausal women, 2 yr of combined teriparatide and denosumab increases bone mineral density more than either drug alone, and switching from either combination or teriparatide to denosumab for an additional 2 yr further increases bone mineral density. Conversely, switching from denosumab to teriparatide results in transient bone loss. The effects of these interventions on spine microarchitecture are unknown. In the DATA and DATA-Switch studies, 94 postmenopausal osteoporotic women were randomized to receive 24 mo of teriparatide (20 µg daily), denosumab (60 mg every 6 mo), or both. Then, women originally assigned to 24 mo of teriparatide received 24 mo of denosumab, whereas subjects originally randomized to 24 mo of denosumab received 24 mo of teriparatide. Subjects who received both drugs received an additional 24 mo of denosumab alone. Spine trabecular bone score (TBS, a gray-level textural assessment of bone microarchitecture) was measured blinded from treatment groups using images from 2-dimensional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry spine scans at 0, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 48 mo in 65 women who had posterior-anterior spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry images suitable for TBS analysis. After 24 mo, TBS increased by 2.7 ± 4.7% in the teriparatide group (p = 0.009 vs baseline), by 1.8 ± 5.0% in the denosumab group (p = 0.118 vs baseline), and by 4.5 ± 6.7% in the combination group (p = 0.017 vs baseline), with no significant between-group differences. In the 6 mo after the treatments were switched (months 24-30), TBS continued to increase in the combination-to-denosumab and teriparatide-to-denosumab groups but decreased by -1.1 ± 4.0% in the denosumab-to-teriparatide group (p < 0.05 vs other groups). After 48 mo, compared to month 0, TBS increased by 5.1 ± 5.8% in the teriparatide-to-denosumab group, by 3.6 ± 4.2% in the denosumab-to-teriparatide group, and by 6.1 ± 4.7% in the combination-to-denosumab group (p < 0.001 vs baseline for all groups, p = not significant for between-group differences). Switching from teriparatide to denosumab also increased spine TBS. Conversely, switching from denosumab to teriparatide transiently degraded spine trabecular microarchitecture, the clinical consequences of which require further study.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonAgedBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsCancellous BoneDenosumabDrug SubstitutionDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOsteoporosisPostmenopauseSingle-Blind MethodTeriparatideBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabTeriparatideDenosumabosteoporosisteriparatide

Identifiers

PMID28624340
PMCPMC5673584
OpenAlexW2626568597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.