Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28624197›Full record

ReviewMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids2017

CRISPR/Cas9: Transcending the Reality of Genome Editing.

Sergiu Chira, Diana Gulei, Amin Hajitou, Alina-Andreea Zimta, Pierre Cordelier, Ioana Berindan-Neagoe

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Therapeutic Applications of the CRISPR-Cas System.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. New insights on CRISPR/Cas9-based therapy for breast Cancer.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Development of a Self-Restricting CRISPR-Cas9 System to Reduce Off-Target Effects.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sergiu ChiraResearch Center for Functional Genomics, Biomedicine, and Translational Medicine, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Cluj 400377, Romania. Electronic address: sergiu.chira@umfcluj.ro.
Diana GuleiMedFuture Research Center for Advanced Medicine, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Cluj 400377, Romania.
Amin HajitouCancer Phage Therapy Group, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Alina-Andreea ZimtaResearch Center for Functional Genomics, Biomedicine, and Translational Medicine, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Cluj 400377, Romania.
Pierre CordelierCancer Research Center of Toulouse, Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénéées, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, INSERM, 31100 Toulouse, France. Electronic address: pierre.cordelier@inserm.fr.
Ioana Berindan-NeagoeResearch Center for Functional Genomics, Biomedicine, and Translational Medicine, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Cluj 400377, Romania; MedFuture Research Center for Advanced Medicine, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Cluj 400377, Romania; Department of Functional Genomics and Experimental Pathology, The Oncology Institute "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta," Cluj-Napoca, Cluj 400015, Romania.
Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROImperial College London · GBInserm · FR

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701159
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the expansion of the microbiology field of research, a new genome editing tool arises from the biology of bacteria that holds the promise of achieving precise modifications in the genome with a simplicity and versatility that surpasses previous genome editing methods. This new technique, commonly named CRISPR/Cas9, led to a rapid expansion of the biomedical field; more specifically, cancer characterization and modeling have benefitted greatly from the genome editing capabilities of CRISPR/Cas9. In this paper, we briefly summarize recent improvements in CRISPR/Cas9 design meant to overcome the limitations that have arisen from the nuclease activity of Cas9 and the influence of this technology in cancer research. In addition, we present challenges that might impede the clinical applicability of CRISPR/Cas9 for cancer therapy and highlight future directions for designing CRISPR/Cas9 delivery systems that might prove useful for cancer therapeutics.

Indexed as

cancerCas9 regulationCRISPR/Cas9gene editingmultiplex CRISPR/Cas9phage-derived vectors

Identifiers

PMID28624197
PMCPMC5415201
OpenAlexW2604118127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.